2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.2260334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Modeling for Damped Sinusoids From Multiple Channels

Abstract: The problem of parametric modeling for noisy damped sinusoidal signals from multiple channels is addressed. Utilizing the shift invariance property of the signal subspace, the number of distinct sinusoidal poles in the multiple channels is first determined. With the estimated number, the distinct frequencies and damping factors are then computed with the multi-channel weighted linear prediction method. The estimated sinusoidal poles are then matched to each channel according to the extreme value theory of dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the multi-channel parameter estimation methods in [10] and [8], it has been considered that a desired signal is contaminated only by Gaussian noise, although in situations with spatially separated interference signals, which are likely in real scenarios, the joint fundamental frequency and constrained model order estimates [14] can be facilitated using spatial filters [20]. Simulations show beamforming will yield better results than the corresponding single-channel estimates, and the optimal MVDR beamformer outperforms the DS, as an example, for closely spaced signal sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the multi-channel parameter estimation methods in [10] and [8], it has been considered that a desired signal is contaminated only by Gaussian noise, although in situations with spatially separated interference signals, which are likely in real scenarios, the joint fundamental frequency and constrained model order estimates [14] can be facilitated using spatial filters [20]. Simulations show beamforming will yield better results than the corresponding single-channel estimates, and the optimal MVDR beamformer outperforms the DS, as an example, for closely spaced signal sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the state-of-the-art methods for fundamental frequency and number of harmonics estimations, the desired signal is assumed to be degraded by additive white Gaussian noise [7][8][9][10]. For example, the Markov-like weighted leastsquares (WLS) [11] (see also [1,12]) and the maximum a posteriori (MAP) [6,13] methods are fundamental frequency and number of harmonics estimators for only one signal source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have the advantage of performing robustly. Recent approaches [40], [41] to simultaneously estimate the model order and the parameters rely on a signal model described in the frequency domain. These models come with a systematic error.…”
Section: ) Contributions Assuming the Correct Model Order Is Optimalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], the authors propose a promising shift-invariance based order selection technique for exponential data modeling. This technique was then further employed in a proposal for joint parameter estimation and model order selection in [40]. The authors could numerically show the impact of model order selection on the parameter estimation.…”
Section: ) Contributions Assuming the Correct Model Order Is Optimalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation