2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric method of compensation for near-surface heterogeneity in processing CDP data

Abstract: Compensation for near-surface heterogeneity is an important part of the seismic reflection method. The problem is solved by continuing the observed wavefield to a horizontal datum. Traditionally, two reflection traveltime curves determined from survey and datum lines are related by static shift corrections. In this paper, we solve a continuation problem in which the relation between the traveltimes of the observed and continued wavefields is given by the root-mean-square velocity equation for a two-layer earth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the magnitude of the anomaly for the three-dimensional model is smaller than for the two-dimensional, it can be seen that in any case the axial setup is more sensitive to resistivity variations than the equatorial one, and, therefore, should be used primarily during field works. Data of a good signal-to-noise ratio were obtained as a result of seismic modeling [9], highlighting the target research objects: reflections from the Bazhenov formation layer, -fault‖ zone, an anomaly in the Bazhenov formation, reflections from the basement (Figures 6 and 7).…”
Section: The Results Of the Electromagnetic And Seismic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the magnitude of the anomaly for the three-dimensional model is smaller than for the two-dimensional, it can be seen that in any case the axial setup is more sensitive to resistivity variations than the equatorial one, and, therefore, should be used primarily during field works. Data of a good signal-to-noise ratio were obtained as a result of seismic modeling [9], highlighting the target research objects: reflections from the Bazhenov formation layer, -fault‖ zone, an anomaly in the Bazhenov formation, reflections from the basement (Figures 6 and 7).…”
Section: The Results Of the Electromagnetic And Seismic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The methods of analysis in geophysics are closely connected to the vital task of inspection of underground pipelines and tunnels [14,39,[46][47][48]. Also, for some types of rocks and minerals that may be located at great depth, where the seismic responses do not represent explicitly the physical objects, for additional verification the methods of non-destructive evaluation [48] may be effective anomalies measured at a distance from the damaged section of the structure with the disturbed section shows that the magnetometer used in the procedure registers the disturbances, but not directly from the defective pipeline itself.…”
Section: Non-destructive Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, for some types of rocks and minerals that may be located at great depth, where the seismic responses do not represent explicitly the physical objects, for additional verification the methods of non-destructive evaluation [48] may be effective anomalies measured at a distance from the damaged section of the structure with the disturbed section shows that the magnetometer used in the procedure registers the disturbances, but not directly from the defective pipeline itself. The linear dimensions of the magnetic anomaly are several orders of magnitude larger than the linear dimensions of the defects themselves, which suggests that secondary processes may occur [47,48]. Such processes may include electrochemical effects due to contact of the conductive surface with an aggressive ion-conducting rock system or soil; accumulated elastic-plastic deformations in the body of the pipe; macroscopic scattering of the signal on a cluster of small defects.…”
Section: Non-destructive Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation