2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric mapping and quantitative analysis of the human calvarium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the varying anatomical conditions are one reason for different tDCS effects. Because skull thickness determines the flow of current through the brain and thus the strength of tDCS effects (Datta et al, 2011 ; Giordano et al, 2017 ), one plausible reason for smaller tDCS effects over V1 compared to M1 can be seen in the relatively greater skull thickness and density of the occipital bone compared to the parietal bone (Voie et al, 2014 ; Zarghooni et al, 2016 ). The tDCS effects are also dependent on the distance and orientation of neuronal axons to the electrode (Paulus, 2003 ): the drift of membrane potential is higher and the tDCS effect more intense when current flow directs longitudinal to the neuronal axons, like in M1, than cross the axons (Nitsche et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the varying anatomical conditions are one reason for different tDCS effects. Because skull thickness determines the flow of current through the brain and thus the strength of tDCS effects (Datta et al, 2011 ; Giordano et al, 2017 ), one plausible reason for smaller tDCS effects over V1 compared to M1 can be seen in the relatively greater skull thickness and density of the occipital bone compared to the parietal bone (Voie et al, 2014 ; Zarghooni et al, 2016 ). The tDCS effects are also dependent on the distance and orientation of neuronal axons to the electrode (Paulus, 2003 ): the drift of membrane potential is higher and the tDCS effect more intense when current flow directs longitudinal to the neuronal axons, like in M1, than cross the axons (Nitsche et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human skulls were obtained from the University of California San Diego, Department of Anatomy skull bank. Each skull was UCSD-tagged with an inventory number, sex and age All human skull information has been previously documented by Voie et al [ 33 ]. Throughout the manuscript, skull #12–325 data is highlighted since it was used in the photographic series in Figs 2 , 4 and 5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the certificate of inspection, the uncertainty of measurement is U = 0.000044 inches. Human skull thickness and density were measured using the methods developed and described in detail by Voie et al[ 33 ]. Briefly, the skull was placed in the bore of a Discovery CT750 HD (GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA) CT scanner and scanned to create a set of DICOM images (OsiriX, OsiriX Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland), which were read into MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) to create 3D matrix of CT values, along with the voxel coordinates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data utilized is collected from studies by Loder [23], Kriewall [24], Li [25], Garfin [26], Wong [27], Desouza [28], Moreira [29], Sullivan [30], Voie [31] and Lillie [32] on adult and pediatric parietal bone structure and thickness as shown in Figure 8(a) In order to include data regarding gestational period skull thicknesses, the point of birth was considered to be 9 months after conception, with a post conception age of 36 weeks corresponding to the 0 point on the X-axis. Furthermore, whenever the thickness was given in tandem with an age range and sample size, an average age between the extremes was assumed, with the number of identical points corresponding to the given sample size.…”
Section: Figure 7: (A) Schematic Illustrating the Location Of Parietamentioning
confidence: 99%