2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric evaluation of large-scale high-temperature electrolysis hydrogen production using different advanced nuclear reactor heat sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to steam electrolysis, SOECs can be used to electrolyze CO 2 for CO and O 2 production [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Co-electrolysis of CO 2 and H 2 O has also been demonstrated to be feasible for simultaneous production of H 2 and CO [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], which can be subsequently processed for synthetic fuel production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to steam electrolysis, SOECs can be used to electrolyze CO 2 for CO and O 2 production [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Co-electrolysis of CO 2 and H 2 O has also been demonstrated to be feasible for simultaneous production of H 2 and CO [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], which can be subsequently processed for synthetic fuel production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-electrolysis of CO 2 and H 2 O has also been demonstrated to be feasible for simultaneous production of H 2 and CO [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], which can be subsequently processed for synthetic fuel production. In an SOEC used for H 2 O/CO 2 co-electrolysis, 3 reactions take place simultaneously, namely H 2 O electrolysis, CO 2 electrolysis, and reversible water gas shift reaction (WGSR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With only a fraction of the total coolant flow rejecting its heat to the precooler at a sink temperature of 36°C, the power cycle heat rejection rate (waste heat) is 305 MW. This compares to a waste heat rejection rate of approximately 358 MW for an equivalent direct helium Brayton power plant cycle powered by a 600 MW t reactor at a reactor outlet temperature of 750°C [11]. The waste heat rejection rate for the supercritical CO 2 recompression Brayton cycle is, therefore, approximately 15% less than that of the equivalent recuperated helium Brayton cycle, contributing to the overall higher thermal efficiency of the supercritical CO 2 recompression Brayton power plant cycle.…”
Section: Direct Supercritical Co 2 Recompression Brayton Power Plant mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Harvego et al [19] provided a comparison of advanced nuclear reactors capable of operating at reactor outlet temperatures of 600 to 900 °C and found that the hydrogen production efficiencies could range between 25 and 55%. For comparison, the best hydrogen-production efficiencies range from 60 to 80% [20] depending on the system design Figure 4: HYSYS flow sheet model of modified HTSEP that has additional heat recuperation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Integration Cases Of Npp-htsepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen co-production from subcritical water-cooled nuclear power plants in [19]. Thus, energy storage using hydrogen is not simply an option for high-temperature plants, but could be an opportunity even for existing subcritical water-based NPPs including CANDU stations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Integration Cases Of Npp-htsepmentioning
confidence: 99%