2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12093889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Assessment of Trend Test Power in a Changing Environment

Abstract: In the context of climate and environmental change assessment, the use of probabilistic models in which the parameters of a given distribution may vary in accordance with time has reinforced the need for appropriate procedures to recognize the “statistical significance” of trends in data series arising from stochastic processes. This paper introduces a parametric methodology, which exploits a measure based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AICΔ), and a Rescaled version of the Generalized Extreme Value distr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide number of procedures is currently available for this type of modelling. At the same time, a growing number of papers criticized the traditional tools for assessing nonstationarity, both with parametric and non-parametric tests [14][15][16][17], in particular with respect to their statistical power. This is not a trivial issue because of, as recognized by Vogel et al [18], when moving in the field of infrastructure decision committing a type II error means incurring in under-preparedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A wide number of procedures is currently available for this type of modelling. At the same time, a growing number of papers criticized the traditional tools for assessing nonstationarity, both with parametric and non-parametric tests [14][15][16][17], in particular with respect to their statistical power. This is not a trivial issue because of, as recognized by Vogel et al [18], when moving in the field of infrastructure decision committing a type II error means incurring in under-preparedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, concerns about past changes and possible evolutions of climate on the phenomenology of rainfall raised questioning about the opportunity of retaining the still valid adoption of stationary hypothesis during the IDF/DDF deriving procedure [7][8][9][10]. Implications arising from the adoption of nonstationary probability distributions for modelling changes in extremes and applications of related statistical tests for trend detection were discussed in several studies (e.g., [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, this test is not dependent on the magnitude of the data, assumptions of distribution, missing data, or the regularity of monitoring periods. Although the MK test is used in many studies for detection of trends in hydrological time series, there are some caveats regarding the power of the test based on the pre-assigned significance level, magnitude of the trend, sample size, and the amount of variation in the time series [45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters (, and are important parameters for the ASP, given that knowing these parameters leads to knowledge of both the process's mean and variance and the process's general trend and power [10]. The statistical inference results of ASP were recently presented with the assumption that the random variable follows specific distributions [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%