2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-011-0249-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric and nonparametric tests for speckled imagery

Abstract: Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has a pivotal role as a remote imaging method. Obtained by means of coherent illumination, SAR images are contaminated with speckle noise. The statistical modeling of such contamination is well described according with the multiplicative model and its implied G 0 distribution. The understanding of SAR imagery and scene element identification is an important objective in the field. In particular, reliable image contrast tools are sought. Aiming the proposition of new tools for eva… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nascimento et al [29] used the same approach for intensity data under the G 0 I distribution, and compared the performance of test statistics derived from a number of (h-φ) distances (Kullback-Leibler, Rényi, Hellinger, Bhattacharyya, Jensen-Shannon, Arithmetic-Geometric, Triangular, and Harmonic Mean) as features for image classification. Cintra et al [35] compared some of these measures with parametric and nonparametric tests, and they outperformed other techniques in terms of efficiency and robustness.…”
Section: Stochastic Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nascimento et al [29] used the same approach for intensity data under the G 0 I distribution, and compared the performance of test statistics derived from a number of (h-φ) distances (Kullback-Leibler, Rényi, Hellinger, Bhattacharyya, Jensen-Shannon, Arithmetic-Geometric, Triangular, and Harmonic Mean) as features for image classification. Cintra et al [35] compared some of these measures with parametric and nonparametric tests, and they outperformed other techniques in terms of efficiency and robustness.…”
Section: Stochastic Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariance matrices for each class were the estimated covariance matrices, using the training samples presented in Figure 1(a), whose numbers of pixels are shown in Table III. These covariance matrices are presented in equations (14)- (22) of the appendix. The simulation was performed with four looks and three polarization bands, HH, HV and VV.…”
Section: B Simulated Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariance matrices of the nine classes of the SIR-C images were estimated by maximum likelihood using the selected training samples (Figure 1(a) and Table III). Equations (14) to (22) present the estimated covariance matrices for the following classes: River, Caatinga, Prepared Soil, Soybean 1, Soybean 2, Soybean 3, Tillage, Corn 1, and Corn 2, respectively. These matrices were the parameter used for image simulation under the Wishart model, as described in section V-B.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cintra et al [19] showed that these statistics outperform the Kolmogorov-Smirnov nonparametric test in intensity SAR imagery. In this paper, we aim to quantify contrast in PolSAR images and situations with r = 2.…”
Section: B Asymptotic Variancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive examination of these measures is presented and applied to intensity SAR data in [18], [19], and to PolSAR models in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%