1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0037217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric analysis of brain stimulation reward in the rat: III. Effect of performance variables on the reward summation function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
104
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that rats with CHF demonstrated maximum response rates similar to baseline maximum rates indicates the absence of confounding motor/performance effects. This conclusion is consistent with other research employing curve shift paradigms for the analysis of selfstimulation (12,25). For instance, it has been suggested that changes in asymptotic performance in selfstimulation indicate that the manipulation in question has interfered with the animal's ability to perform the task, whereas a shift in the midpoint of the curve (i.e., the ECu 50 ) infers a change in the sensitivity to the rewarding properties of the stimulus (12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The fact that rats with CHF demonstrated maximum response rates similar to baseline maximum rates indicates the absence of confounding motor/performance effects. This conclusion is consistent with other research employing curve shift paradigms for the analysis of selfstimulation (12,25). For instance, it has been suggested that changes in asymptotic performance in selfstimulation indicate that the manipulation in question has interfered with the animal's ability to perform the task, whereas a shift in the midpoint of the curve (i.e., the ECu 50 ) infers a change in the sensitivity to the rewarding properties of the stimulus (12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A basic property of drugs of abuse is that they increase the rewarding efficacy of LH self-stimulation, an effect reflected in the shift of the rate-frequency function to the left (for review, see [60,61]). There is strong evidence, that the presently used intracranial self-stimulation paradigm provides reward-threshold estimates that are unaffected by performance effects of drug treatments or other experimental manipulations [17,38,39,45]. This is also evident in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In contrast to SB-277011A or NGB 2904, the partial D 3 receptor agonist BP-897 produces a dose-dependent inhibition of both METH-enhanced BSR and BSR itself. This inhibition of BSR or METH-enhanced BSR is unlikely due to non-specific sedative effects, locomotor inhibition, or locomotor impairment, as none of the compounds significantly altered Ymax levels, a parameter highly sensitive to locomotor inhibition (Edmonds and Gallistel 1974;Miliaressis and Rompré 1987;Fouriezos et al 1990). These data suggest that selective blockade of DA D 3 receptors by relatively low doses of SB-277011A or NGB 2904 significantly inhibits the acute rewarding effects of METH, while these D 3 receptor antagonists themselves appear to have no intrinsic rewarding effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%