1999
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters That Specify the Timing of Cytokinesis

Abstract: One model for the timing of cytokinesis is based on findings that p34cdc2 can phosphorylate myosin regulatory light chain (LC20) on inhibitory sites (serines 1 and 2) in vitro (Satterwhite, L.L., M.H. Lohka, K.L. Wilson, T.Y. Scherson, L.J. Cisek, J.L. Corden, and T.D. Pollard. 1992. J. Cell Biol. 118:595–605), and this inhibition is proposed to delay cytokinesis until p34cdc2 activity falls at anaphase. We have characterized previously several kinase activities associated with the isolated cortical cytoskelet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This stands in contrast to earlier models for the timing of cytokinesis where myosin II activity was thought to be dependent on complete inactivation of cyclindependent kinase . However, previous manipulation studies in sea urchin eggs (Shuster and Burgess, 1999) as well as in tissue culture cells (Rosenblatt et al, 2004) argue that myosin II activity may not be significantly suppressed during mitosis. Furthermore, mobilization of calcium early in mitosis resulted in a cortical contractile response (Figure 10), providing yet further evidence that myosin II is capable of responding to contractile signals in the presence of elevated cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)1 activity.…”
Section: Signaling Pathways Regulating Myosin II Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This stands in contrast to earlier models for the timing of cytokinesis where myosin II activity was thought to be dependent on complete inactivation of cyclindependent kinase . However, previous manipulation studies in sea urchin eggs (Shuster and Burgess, 1999) as well as in tissue culture cells (Rosenblatt et al, 2004) argue that myosin II activity may not be significantly suppressed during mitosis. Furthermore, mobilization of calcium early in mitosis resulted in a cortical contractile response (Figure 10), providing yet further evidence that myosin II is capable of responding to contractile signals in the presence of elevated cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)1 activity.…”
Section: Signaling Pathways Regulating Myosin II Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous mapping of MRLC phosphorylation in dividing sea urchin eggs revealed an increase in cortical Ser19 phosphorylation during anaphase but detected little Ser19 phosphorylation during metaphase (Shuster and Burgess, 1999). To examine myosin activation in vivo, fertilized eggs were fixed and processed for microtubule and phospho-Ser19 MRLC localization ( Figure 3) by using an antibody previously demonstrated to react with phosphorylated sea urchin myosin regulatory light chain (Stack et al, 2006) aphase or cytokinesis, where light chain phosphorylation was confined to the cleavage plane (Figure 3, G-L).…”
Section: A Global Increase In Cortical Contractility Accompanies the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As its name implies, the constriction of the CAR is based on the sliding interaction of actin filaments powered by the motor activity of a type II myosin (Schroeder, 1973). Numerous other proteins are required for ring assembly and contraction and to link the CAR to the cell membrane, allowing actin filament sliding to constrict the cell surface in the space vacated by the retreating chromosomes (reviewed in Rappaport, 1996;Shuster and Burgess, 1999;Glotzer, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nuclei were well separated but not condensed, suggesting that cytokinesis, rather than karyokine sis, was impaired. Indeed, a closer examination of 4N LK cells found a major accumulation of anaphaselike cells, which usu ally coincided with cytokinesis (Shuster and Burgess, 1999), whereas the frequency of metaphase cells was not significantly altered ( Fig. 6 D), also suggesting a deficiency in later mitotic phases.…”
Section: Rhoa Regulates Cytokinesis Of Hpcs Through the Rock And Mdiamentioning
confidence: 99%