The actual mechanism of action of immunosuppressive drugs is difficult to determine partly because the precise physiology of the immune response has not been completely characterized. Fkssible sites of action by these drugs have recently been reviewed by Bach (1). These potential target sites are: a) phagocytosis and antigen processing by macrophages; b) antigen recognition by lymphocytes; c) differentiation of lymphocytes; d) mitoses of thymus-dependent (T) lymphocytes and bone marrow-dependent (B) lymphocytes; and e) the so-called final effect which includes antibody production, secretion of delayed hypersensitivity mediators and lymphocyte cytotoxicity of the contact type.The three cytotoxic drugs, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and methotrexate, are representative of the three major classes of compounds which have been studied in greatest detail and which have been most used for treatment of the rheumatic diseases. As reviewed by Dr. Bertino, cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent. Azathioprine is a purine analogue. Since azathioprine is a derivative of 6-mercaptopurine (6 MP), I will discuss these two drugs interchangeably. Methotrexate is a folic acid antagonist. All three of these drugs have been shown to suppress primary and secondary humoral immune responses, delayed hypersensitivity, skin graft rejection and animal diseases of autoimmunity. Unfortunately, there are few studies which have compared the effects of these three drugs under the same experimental conditions. However, some rather striking differences in mechanism of action of the three agents have become apparent, and I will try to summarize them.I would first like to discuss the antiinflammatory properties of these drugs. Page, Condie and Good (2) showed that, if one injects egg albumin into the skin of a rabbit, polymorphonuclear leukocytes begin to arrive in the lesion during the first 4 hours and these are followed by mononuclear cells. If, however, the animals are pretreated with 6 MP, the polymorphonuclear leukocytes arrive in the lesion normally, but the numbers of mononuclear cells are markedly decreased. Neither cyclophosphamide nor methotrexate was effective in this respect (3).We have also studied this phenomenon (4) and were able to demonstrate that relative to control animals, animals treated with 6 MP had significant decreases in the numbers of large lymphocytes and monocytes in the blood without a significant fall in the numbers of polymorphonuclear leukocytes or small and medium lymphocytes. Concurrently, a significant decrease was also seen in the percentage of tissue mononuclear cells in the inflammatory skin lesion. There was a highly significant correlation between the numbers of monocytes in the blood and the percent of mononuclear cells in the lesion. These data suggest that the anti-