2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters identification of PV solar cells and modules using flexible particle swarm optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In which x = sin ( t∕10) . In order to have a quantitative comparison, consider the criterion Fitness = ∫ 10 0 � ∑ i e 2 i � dt [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. All the controller parameters are the same as those presented in simulation 1.…”
Section: Simulation 2: Comparison Between Different Uncertainty Estimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In which x = sin ( t∕10) . In order to have a quantitative comparison, consider the criterion Fitness = ∫ 10 0 � ∑ i e 2 i � dt [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. All the controller parameters are the same as those presented in simulation 1.…”
Section: Simulation 2: Comparison Between Different Uncertainty Estimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods used data mining techniques like support vector machine [21][22][23][24], K-nearest neighbor as in [25][26][27]. In addition, there are some optimization techniques such as genetic algorithm and particle swarm in were used to predict and improve the solar system depending on environmental factors such as the temperature, wind, and cloud [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Fig 3 Pv and Wind Energy Project Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of cells in parallel [61] 7.7301E − 04 NA NA NA LI [62] 1.0548E − 03 NA NA NA TSLLS [63] 7.7301E − 04 NA NA NA Tong and Pora [49] 1.5051E − 03 NA NA NA Tayyan [64] 2.9117E − 03 NA NA NA MABC [65] 9.862E − 04 NA NA NA ABSO [66] 9.9124E − 04 NA NA NA BBO-M [67] 9.8634E − 04 NA NA NA GGHS [68] 9.9078E − 04 NA NA NA CARO [69] 9.8665E − 04 NA NA NA SOS [24] 9.8609E − 04 1.1982E − 03 1.0245E − 5.2184E − 05 MSSO [70] 9.8607E − 04 NA NA NA CWOA [21] 9.8604E − 04 NA NA 1.0216E − 08 CSO [71] 9.8602E − 04 NA 9.8602E − 5.4941E − 09 MADE [72] 9.8602E − 04 9.8602E − 04 9.8602E − 2.74E − 15 EO-Jaya [73] 9.8603E − 04 NA NA NA ILCOA [74] 9.8602E − 04 NA NA NA FPSO [75] 9.8602E − 04 NA NA 2.0142E − 08 PGJAYA [76] 9.8602E − 04 9.8602E − 04 9.8602E − 1.4485E − 09 OBWOA [77] 9.8602E − 04 NA NA NA ABC-TRR [78] 9.8602E − 04 9.8602E − 04 9.8602E − 6.15E − 17 NM-MPSO [79] 9.8602E − 04 NA NA NA SDO 9.8602E − 04 9.8616E − 04 9.8603E − 2.5141E − 08 DDM MABC [65] 9.8276E − 04 NA NA NA ABSO [66] 9.8344E − 04 NA NA NA BBO-M [67] 9.8272E − 04 NA NA NA IGHS [68] 9.8635E − 04 NA NA NA CARO [69] 9.8260E − 04 NA NA NA SOS [24] 9.8518E − 04 1.3498E − 03 1.0627E − 9.6141E − 05 MSSO [70] 9.8281E − 04 NA NA NA CWOA [21] 9.8279E − 04 NA NA 1.1333E − 07 CSO [71] 9.8252E − 04 NA 9.9619E − 3.4681E − 05 MADE [72] 9.8261E − 04 9.8786E − 04 9.8608E − 8.02E − 05 EO-Jaya [73] 9.8262E − 04 NA NA NA ILCOA [74] 9.8257E − 04 NA NA NA FPSO [75] 9.8253E − 04 NA NA 3.1469E − 08 PGJAYA…”
Section: Nomenclature I Dmentioning
confidence: 99%