2000
DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.86.10_689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters for the Evaluation of Hydrogen Embrittlement of High Strength Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Constant Loading Test (CLT), 22,23) Slow Strain Rate Technique (SSRT) 24) and Conventional Strain Rate Test (CSRT), [25][26][27] which are major evaluation methods in the field of UHSS bolts, have been minor methods in the field of UHSS sheets. Presumably, these methods are not widely used with UHSS sheets because only uniaxial deformation test can be conducted by those methods and it is more difficult to predict the risk of hydrogen embrittlement fracture in actual parts with considering the influence of forming modes.…”
Section: Methods Of Evaluating Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance Of Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Constant Loading Test (CLT), 22,23) Slow Strain Rate Technique (SSRT) 24) and Conventional Strain Rate Test (CSRT), [25][26][27] which are major evaluation methods in the field of UHSS bolts, have been minor methods in the field of UHSS sheets. Presumably, these methods are not widely used with UHSS sheets because only uniaxial deformation test can be conducted by those methods and it is more difficult to predict the risk of hydrogen embrittlement fracture in actual parts with considering the influence of forming modes.…”
Section: Methods Of Evaluating Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance Of Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical properties of the steel used. [16][17][18][19][20] иииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииииии( 2 )…”
unclassified
“…H (t=∞, 2) is the equilibrium value at 2nd step loading. 10) . The distributions of the s p are almost same in fracture process zone where the maximum principal stress exceeds 0.8 s p (peak).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 11 Effect of the distribution of the maximum principal stress (s p ) on H D t curves 10) . The H D t curves are same under the same distribution of the s p .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%