2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-013-0631-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters for Sample Size Estimation from a Group-Randomized HIV Prevention Trial in HIV Clinics in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: Sample size calculations for a group-randomized trial (GRT) require an estimate of the expected intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). However, few ICC estimates from GRTs in HIV/AIDS research have been published, leaving investigators with little data on which to base expectations. We used data from a multi-country study to estimate ICCs for variables related to physical and mental health and HIV risk behaviors. ICCs for perceptions of physical and mental health tended to be higher than those for HIV risk … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cohort allowed for the calculation of ICCs for many novel outcomes. Furthermore, while previous papers reporting ICCs for HIV-related outcomes relied exclusively on data available at baseline [18] , [19] , [20] , this paper estimated ICCs using both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Because most cRCTs focus on longitudinal outcomes, these ICCs may better reflect future researchers' chosen study designs than ICCs calculated from baseline data alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This cohort allowed for the calculation of ICCs for many novel outcomes. Furthermore, while previous papers reporting ICCs for HIV-related outcomes relied exclusively on data available at baseline [18] , [19] , [20] , this paper estimated ICCs using both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Because most cRCTs focus on longitudinal outcomes, these ICCs may better reflect future researchers' chosen study designs than ICCs calculated from baseline data alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these studies, two focused on sexual attitudes and behaviors among adolescents and young adults in the United States [18] , [19] . One study calculated ICCs for outcomes among people living with HIV, but included only a limited number of clinical outcomes and calculated ICCs using baseline data alone, which is applicable to future cross-sectional studies but not necessarily prospective studies [20] . This paper aims to provide estimates of the ICC for HIV-related clinical outcomes calculated both cross-sectionally and longitudinally among clinics supporting patients enrolled in a large urban HIV care and treatment program in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The less conservative effect size of 2.43 was used because this trial will include only women who have already used HECs, unlike the prior research which recruited adolescent girls regardless of their contraceptive use [32]. Then, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.006 was considered [33,34]. The ICC was adapted from a clinic-based condom use intervention in SSA [33].…”
Section: Phase I: Identify Positive Deviantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.006 was considered [33,34]. The ICC was adapted from a clinic-based condom use intervention in SSA [33]. The required minimum sample size was 760 after considering the ICC.…”
Section: Phase I: Identify Positive Deviantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect size of 2.43 was used, considering the contents of the planned intervention. Then, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.006 was considered [33,34]. The ICC was adapted from a clinic-based condom use intervention in SSA [33].…”
Section: Phase Ii: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Sample Eligibmentioning
confidence: 99%