2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2458(10)80006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters Effecting 2D Barcode Scanning Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Only 6.9% of the answers contained personal comments from users. Some regarded the environment, confirming that the light in the room can a↵ect the scanning task and the surface where the QR code is printed can a↵ect the scanning outcome, as already discussed in (Grover et al, 2010). Other comments regarded the di culty in scanning very big barcodes that might require to move the phone far from the sheet of paper.…”
Section: User Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…• Only 6.9% of the answers contained personal comments from users. Some regarded the environment, confirming that the light in the room can a↵ect the scanning task and the surface where the QR code is printed can a↵ect the scanning outcome, as already discussed in (Grover et al, 2010). Other comments regarded the di culty in scanning very big barcodes that might require to move the phone far from the sheet of paper.…”
Section: User Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This involved fifteen scan iterations for each sample barcode and enumerating the results as a percentage scan reliability value. For the purpose of this testing, a “good scan” is defined as a successful scan in less than 2 s. A “delayed scan” is a successful scan that takes 2–7 s and a “No scan” is failure to scan even after 7 s (Grover et al , 2010).…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%