All Days 1998
DOI: 10.2118/48928-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters Affecting Azimuth and Length of a Secondary Fracture During a Refracture Treatment

Abstract: Refracturing in a plane normal to that of the initial fracture can be beneficial in tight gas fields, even when the initial fracture is deeply penetrating and highly conductive. The magnitude of the benefits will depend on the timing and the penetration of the secondary fracture. The Gas Research Institute has sponsored a project that addresses the conditions required for maximum benefit and the validation of the process with a field trial. This paper addresses the theory and conditions required for maximum be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of the stress-reversal region (L f Ј) is not limited to 0.58 L f , which has been shown numerically by Siebrits et al (1998) to be the highest possible value of L f Ј because of poroelastic effects. It may even extend to a distance larger than the fracture half-length (L f ).…”
Section: δSmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The extent of the stress-reversal region (L f Ј) is not limited to 0.58 L f , which has been shown numerically by Siebrits et al (1998) to be the highest possible value of L f Ј because of poroelastic effects. It may even extend to a distance larger than the fracture half-length (L f ).…”
Section: δSmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, in other cases where signifi cant volumes of fl uids have been produced from a well, poroelastic effects can be dominant. The structure of stress reorientation around a single fracture because of poroelastic effects has been well described in the literature (Siebrits et al 1998;Singh et al 2008;Roussel and Sharma 2010). In the vicinity of the fracture, the direction of maximum horizontal stress is rotated 90° from its in-situ direction (for producing wells).…”
Section: Comparison Of Stress Reorientation Because Of Poroelastic Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In tight gas plays, poroelastic stress interference has been investigated and applied to the refracturing of vertical wells (Roussel 2011;Roussel and Sharma 2010a, 2010b;Siebrits and Elbel 1998;Warpinski and Branagan 1989;Weng and Siebrits 2007). In the case of a previously fractured well, it is possible to create a secondary fracture that is perpendicular to the first.…”
Section: Spe 166503mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-way to resolve this complexity is to develop stress reorientation models for specific 6 SPE 166503 geometries and applications, i.e. vertical-well refracturing (Roussel andSharma 2010a, 2010b;Siebrits and Elbel 1998) or in this paper case, the stimulation of infill horizontal wells.…”
Section: Where Do Fracs Grow (In Depleted/waterflooded Reservoirs)?mentioning
confidence: 99%