2020
DOI: 10.7155/jgaa.00526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterized Algorithms for Book Embedding Problems

Abstract: A k-page book embedding of a graph G draws the vertices of G on a line and the edges on k half-planes (called pages) bounded by this line, such that no two edges on the same page cross. We study the problem of determining whether G admits a k-page book embedding both when the linear order of the vertices is fixed, called Fixed-Order Book Thickness, or not fixed, called Book Thickness. Both problems are known to be NP-complete in general. We show that Fixed-Order Book Thickness and Book Thickness are fixed-para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most (in particular, the early efforts) have been directed at variants of the classic Crossing Minimization problem, introduced by Turán in 1940 [56], parameterized by the number of crossings (see, e.g., [34,46,26,39,40,47]). However, in the past few years, there is an increasing interest in the analysis of a variety of other problems in graph drawing from the perspective of parameterized complexity (see, e.g., [10,2,35,14,38,6,21,20,11,23,49,48] and the upcoming Dagstuhl seminar [1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most (in particular, the early efforts) have been directed at variants of the classic Crossing Minimization problem, introduced by Turán in 1940 [56], parameterized by the number of crossings (see, e.g., [34,46,26,39,40,47]). However, in the past few years, there is an increasing interest in the analysis of a variety of other problems in graph drawing from the perspective of parameterized complexity (see, e.g., [10,2,35,14,38,6,21,20,11,23,49,48] and the upcoming Dagstuhl seminar [1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%