2002
DOI: 10.1039/b206991a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterization of the electronegativity equalization method based on the charge model 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bultinck et al 36 fitted EEM empirical charges to DFT-derived charges and obtained optimized, transferable electronegativity and hardness parameters. As Menegon et al demonstrated, 37 original EEM charges were fitted to reproduce charges of the Charge Model 1, 14 and the quality of fit was as good as 0.977 in terms of the correlation coefficient. A similar approach was employed by Zefirov and coworkers 38 to fit the KCM charges 18,27 to the RESP charges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bultinck et al 36 fitted EEM empirical charges to DFT-derived charges and obtained optimized, transferable electronegativity and hardness parameters. As Menegon et al demonstrated, 37 original EEM charges were fitted to reproduce charges of the Charge Model 1, 14 and the quality of fit was as good as 0.977 in terms of the correlation coefficient. A similar approach was employed by Zefirov and coworkers 38 to fit the KCM charges 18,27 to the RESP charges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fitting is mostly done in a least squares sense by finding the parameters that minimize the quadratic error between the ab initio computed charges and the ones obtained using a set of systematically improved parameters; see, for example, Refs. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In practice, such fitting is far from trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Essentially, the EEM is parameterized for the specified level of theory (e.g., HF, B3LYP), basis set (e.g., STO‐3G, 3‐21G, 6‐31G*) and charge calculation scheme [e.g., Mulliken population analysis (MPA), Merz‐Kollman‐Singh (MK), charges from electrostatic potentials using a grid based method (CHELPG)]7. Nowadays, the EEM is parameterized for different combinations of the theory level, basis set, and the scheme for charge calculation as one can see for example in Yang and Shen8, 9, Menegon et al10 and Bultinck et al11, 12 The EEM is also used in cooperation with other chemical techniques (e.g., Smirnov and van de Graaf13, Heidler et al14, and others). In this article, the process of EEM parameters development was performed according to the methodology described in detail in ref 15,.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%