2017
DOI: 10.1051/lhb/2017003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter uncertainty analysis for simulating streamflow in the upper Dong Nai river basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are five calibration techniques built in the SWAT-CUP, such as GLUE (Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation), MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo), ParaSol (Parameter Solution), PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization), and SUFI-2. Amidst these techniques, the SUFI-2 technique was selected because this technique could provide more satisfactory and accurate simulation in the tropical region as compared to other techniques (Khoi et al 2017). The calibration and validation steps were conducted for the periods of 1987-1995 and 1996-2013, correspondingly. The reproducibility of the SWAT model in simulating the river discharge was judged after the model calibration and validation.…”
Section: Swat Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five calibration techniques built in the SWAT-CUP, such as GLUE (Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation), MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo), ParaSol (Parameter Solution), PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization), and SUFI-2. Amidst these techniques, the SUFI-2 technique was selected because this technique could provide more satisfactory and accurate simulation in the tropical region as compared to other techniques (Khoi et al 2017). The calibration and validation steps were conducted for the periods of 1987-1995 and 1996-2013, correspondingly. The reproducibility of the SWAT model in simulating the river discharge was judged after the model calibration and validation.…”
Section: Swat Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the success of streamflow calibration and validation, the model was continuously calibrated and validated for the simulation of nutrient (T-N and T-P) and sediment (TSS) loads for the period 2010-2015 at a monthly time scale. The model calibration and validation were conducted by the SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP) using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) due to its efficiency [15,16].…”
Section: Swat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sequential Uncertainty Fitting version 2 (SUFI-2) algorithm in SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty (SWAT-CUP) Program (Abbaspour 2015) was utilized for the SWAT calibration. The model calibration utilized 12 parameters related to surface, subsurface, and channel hydrological responses, which were chosen in reliance on a review of similar literature (e.g., Khoi et al 2017;Thang et al 2018;Adhikari et al 2020). Based on the availability of the measured discharge data, the calibration step was carried out for the period of 1981-1990 and the validation step was conducted for the period of 1991-1993 at the Phuoc Long stream gauge and 1991-2000 at the Phuoc Hoa, Ta Lai, and Ta Pao stream gauges.…”
Section: Swat Setup Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%