2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2018.8431420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Tuning and Optimal Design of Decentralized Structured Controllers for Power Oscillation Damping in Electrical Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, these underdamped oscillations have been addressed by deploying decentralized controllers called Power System Stabilizers (PSSs) at units participating in the power swing modes. Various control strategies for tuning of PSS parameters have been proposed in the literature, such as pole placement [2], root locus [3], H 2 [4] and H ∞ [5] norm. In particular, PSSs can improve oscillation damping by adjusting the reference signal of the exciter, thus counteracting a high-gain fast response of Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVRs).…”
Section: A Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Traditionally, these underdamped oscillations have been addressed by deploying decentralized controllers called Power System Stabilizers (PSSs) at units participating in the power swing modes. Various control strategies for tuning of PSS parameters have been proposed in the literature, such as pole placement [2], root locus [3], H 2 [4] and H ∞ [5] norm. In particular, PSSs can improve oscillation damping by adjusting the reference signal of the exciter, thus counteracting a high-gain fast response of Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVRs).…”
Section: A Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the existing work on WAC where full state feedback controllers were used [8], [9], [28], we propose a static output feedback controller which eases its practical implementation. Moreover, the proposed control synthesis ensures damping of low-frequency modes by minimizing the upper-bound of the L 2 -gain, which is equivalent to the H ∞ norm of a linear time-invariant system [16], [18] and has been proven to be effective in improving the damping of inter-area modes [5], [9], [19], [29], [30]. For this purpose and, as in any practical WAMC there will inevitably be a minimum nonzero communication delay, we model the delays as interval timevarying delays, i.e., assuming non-zero constant upper and lower bounds [16].…”
Section: B Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many works are based on the Bounded-real Lemma, e.g. [13], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. Alternative approaches include non-smooth optimization [32], [33] and bisectioning [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38], [29], the synthesis procedure is typically centralized. For example, our previous work considered centralized structured controller synthesis [31], [37], [39], [40], whereas here we consider a hierarchical approach. To the authors' knowledge, there are currently no results that consider distributed or hierarchical structured H ∞ synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%