2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter specification for the degree distribution of simulated Barabási–Albert graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not unexpected as Li et al 26 have observed that the preferential attachment model causes biases in the structure of the graph where high-degree nodes are interconnected, and Bubeck et al 27 have theoretically shown that the resulting graph of preferential attachment is very dependent on the starting graph. In addition, Mohd-Zaid et al 28 have empirically shown that the degree distribution of simulated BA networks does not follow the theoretical result originally derived by Barabási and Albert. 4 Therefore, we simulated another set of data to study the behavior of the bias in the expected value and variance and to derive a test for the scale-free property that corrects for this bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not unexpected as Li et al 26 have observed that the preferential attachment model causes biases in the structure of the graph where high-degree nodes are interconnected, and Bubeck et al 27 have theoretically shown that the resulting graph of preferential attachment is very dependent on the starting graph. In addition, Mohd-Zaid et al 28 have empirically shown that the degree distribution of simulated BA networks does not follow the theoretical result originally derived by Barabási and Albert. 4 Therefore, we simulated another set of data to study the behavior of the bias in the expected value and variance and to derive a test for the scale-free property that corrects for this bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Due to the findings in Li et al, 26 Bubeck et al, 27 and Mohd-Zaid et al, 28 the power of the test for β 0 with the assumption that β 0 = 2 . 16 and 2.45 was also computed where the estimates for the correcting scalars were computed using the appropriate β 0 values. However, the result did not differ from when β 0 = 2 which suggests that the power of the test is invariant of β 0 and is strictly a function of the difference from β 0 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watts and Strogatz [6] also defined the characteristic path length to measure the typical separation between two nodes in the network. In more recent years, numerous researches paid attention to degree distribution [7][8][9][10]. Early researches believed that degree distribution followed Poisson Distribution just as the random network theory has described [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%