2003
DOI: 10.1029/ws006p0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter sensitivity in calibration and validation of an annualized agricultural non-point source model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrologic component was adjusted at the beginning of the calibration process (Baginska and Milne-Home, 2003;Muleta and Nicklow, 2005). The amount of runoff was primarily determined by the effective hydraulic conductivity (Nearing et al, 1990;Schoeneberger and Wysocki, 2005).…”
Section: Wepp Model Calibration and Quasi Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrologic component was adjusted at the beginning of the calibration process (Baginska and Milne-Home, 2003;Muleta and Nicklow, 2005). The amount of runoff was primarily determined by the effective hydraulic conductivity (Nearing et al, 1990;Schoeneberger and Wysocki, 2005).…”
Section: Wepp Model Calibration and Quasi Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis reflects the capability of AnnAGNPS to estimate runoff that would be typical for ungauged watersheds, where data for calibration are usually not available. Furthermore, process based models are designed to characterize watershed processes well enough to enable the use of measurable properties and conditions without require formal calibration [44]. AnnAGNPS is one such model that has been developed to include processes that utilize input parameters from databases, e.g., climate, soil information, and crop management operations, developed by NRCS for any location in the U.S.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty analysis was performed to quantify and describe the effect of input parameter variability into the output results. The AnnAGNPS model is an evolving and complex model with a large number of input basic variables and parameters and has been extensively evaluated with sensitivity analyses (Baginska and Milne‐Home, 2003; Chahor et al, 2014; Das et al, 2008; Licciardello et al, 2007; Yuan et al, 2003, 2005, 2006; Zema et al, 2012). Therefore, a detailed uncertainty investigation of the entire AnnAGNPS model is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%