Parameter Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of the Single-Layer Urban Canopy Model in the Megacity of Shanghai

Abstract

In order to meet the demand of more refined urban weather forecast, it is of great practical significance to improve and optimize the single-layer urban canopy model (SLUCM) suitable for the megacity of Shanghai. In this paper, based on the offline SLUCM model driven by a whole-year surface flux observation data in the Shanghai central business district, a series of parameter sensitivity tests are carried out by using the one at a time (OAT) method, the relative importance and a set of optimized parameters of the SLUCM suitable for high-density urban area are established, and the improvement of simulation is evaluated. The results show that SLUCM well reproduces the seasonal mean diurnal patterns of the net all-wave radiation flux ( Q ∗ ) and sensible heat flux (QH) but underestimates their magnitudes. Both Q ∗ and QH are linearly sensitive to the albedo, and most sensitive to the roof albedo, the second to the wall albedo, but relatively insensitive to the road albedo. The sensitivity of Q ∗ and QH to emissivity is not as strong as that of albedo, and the variation trend is also linear. Similar to albedo, Q ∗ and QH are most sensitive to roof emissivity. The effect of thermal parameters (heat capacity and conductivity) on fluxes is logarithmic. The sensitivity of surface fluxes to geometric parameters has no specific variation pattern. After parameter optimization, RMSE of Q ∗ decreases by about 3.4–18.7 Wm−2 in four seasons. RMSE of the longwave radiation (L↑) decreases by about 1.2–7.87 Wm−2. RMSE of QH decreases by about 2–5 Wm−2. This study provides guidance for future development of the urban canopy model parameterizations and urban climate risk response.

Analysis of Uncertainties and Associated Convective Processes in Simulations of Extreme Precipitation Over Cities With a Regional Earth System Model: A Case Study

“…Totally 11 simulation experiments (denoted as EXP01 to EXP11) are conducted, differing solely in the minor variations of the LW emissivity of buildings (roofs and exterior walls) within the BEP, ranging from 0.90 (EXP01) to 0.95 (EXP11) at an interval of 0.005 (Table 1). Previous sensitivity studies utilized value from 0.85 to 0.98 for this parameter in China (Ao & Zhang, 2022), Europe (Loridan et al., 2010), and North America (Salamanca et al., 2011). H.‐Y.…”

“…They encompass various urban-related parameters such as urban morphology, surface roughness, thermodynamic properties (e.g., longwave (LW) emissivity, shortwave (SW) albedo, specific heat capacity), and anthropogenic heat emissions (Garuma, 2018;. Previous studies have mainly investigated the sensitivity of near-surface air temperature and Surface Energy Balance (SEB) to the uncertainties in geometric and thermodynamic parameters of the SLUCMs (Ao & Zhang, 2022;Loridan et al, 2010;Nemunaitis-Berry et al, 2017;Z. H. Wang et al, 2011).…”

“…Sun et al., 2021). Previous studies have mainly investigated the sensitivity of near‐surface air temperature and Surface Energy Balance (SEB) to the uncertainties in geometric and thermodynamic parameters of the SLUCMs (Ao & Zhang, 2022; Loridan et al., 2010; Nemunaitis‐Berry et al., 2017; Z. H. Wang et al., 2011). They confirmed the high sensitivity of different components within SEB to the uncertainties in parameters of the SLUCMs, with the simulated variables being most sensitive to the thermodynamic parameters of roofs (followed by walls).…”