1998
DOI: 10.1021/ci9801825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Refinement for Molecular Docking

Abstract: Finding the optimal parameter values for any computer program with adjustable parameters can be very time consuming. In this paper, we introduce the use of the Plackett-Burman and the central composite designs with the aid of the partial least squares method to tackle this problem. Using DOCK3.5 as a test case, we also show a four-step procedure for sequential docking utilizing two parameter sets, both effecting a different level of accuracy. The DOCK parameter values were refined for protein kinase C regulato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular surface of urease was calculated using a probe atom with a radius of 1.0 Å and a dot density of 8 points/Å. A radius of 0.83 Å was used for the Ni­(II) ions .…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular surface of urease was calculated using a probe atom with a radius of 1.0 Å and a dot density of 8 points/Å. A radius of 0.83 Å was used for the Ni­(II) ions .…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades design of experiments (DoE) 1, 2 has proved to be highly valuable in many fields of pharmaceutical research, including synthesis of molecule libraries, development of analytical methods and quantitative structure activity/property relationship modeling 3–5. However, it is still rarely applied in computer‐based drug research, including docking and virtual screening (VS) investigations, although the potential utility of DoE in such activities has been reported in several studies 6–9. Here, we present a methodology based on DoE for the systematic and thorough identification and analysis of factors influencing the results of docking‐based VS. Two fundamentally different software packages were used in our exploration of influential factors: FRED 10 and GOLD 11–13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known sources of variation in docking results include the settings of docking parameters (parameters that the user can alter influencing, for example, the pose sampling) and choice of post‐docking scoring functions for ranking the docked molecules 6, 9, 26, 30, 37, 41–43. In FRED 10, docking parameters control the positioning of the molecules in the active site, optimization of the binding pose and assessment of fitness of individual conformations ( exhaustive scoring ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Antes et al applied a "design of experiment" strategy to tune empirical scoring functions to kinases and ATPases. 12 Similarly, Salo et al 13 and Andersson et al 14 used experimental design strategies for optimizing protein-ligand docking parameters. Another very promising approach has been proposed by Pham and Jain, who used negative training data, that is, the knowledge not only of binding molecules but additionally of nonbinding molecules, to optimize the generic Surflex scoring function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%