2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation for crop growth model using evolutionary and bio-inspired algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To efficiently solve this calibration problem, many research efforts have focused on developing metaheuristic methods that are capable of finding good solutions in reasonable computation times (Balsa-Canto, Banga, Egea, Fernandez-Villaverde, & de Hijas-Liste, 2012;Banga & Balsa-Canto, 2008;Gábor & Banga, 2015;Sun, Garibaldi, & Hodgman, 2012). Many examples using various metaheuristics can be found in the literature, such as simulating annealing (Perkins, Jaeger, Reinitz, & Glass, 2006), evolutionary strategies (Ji & Xu, 2006;Jostins & Jaeger, 2010), differential evolution (Da Ros et al, 2013;Villaverde & Banga, 2014;Zúñiga, Cruz, & García, 2014), scatter search (Egea, Balsa-Canto, García, & Banga, 2009;Egea, Martí, & Banga, 2010), particle swarm optimization (Palafox, Noman, & Iba, 2012;Tang, Chai, Wang, & Cao, 2020), among others. Also, many proposals exploit different parallelization strategies and infrastructures to solve these problems in competitive execution times (Adams et al, 2013;González et al, 2017;Lee, Hsiao, & Hwang, 2014;Penas, González, Egea, Banga and Doallo, 2015;Teijeiro et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To efficiently solve this calibration problem, many research efforts have focused on developing metaheuristic methods that are capable of finding good solutions in reasonable computation times (Balsa-Canto, Banga, Egea, Fernandez-Villaverde, & de Hijas-Liste, 2012;Banga & Balsa-Canto, 2008;Gábor & Banga, 2015;Sun, Garibaldi, & Hodgman, 2012). Many examples using various metaheuristics can be found in the literature, such as simulating annealing (Perkins, Jaeger, Reinitz, & Glass, 2006), evolutionary strategies (Ji & Xu, 2006;Jostins & Jaeger, 2010), differential evolution (Da Ros et al, 2013;Villaverde & Banga, 2014;Zúñiga, Cruz, & García, 2014), scatter search (Egea, Balsa-Canto, García, & Banga, 2009;Egea, Martí, & Banga, 2010), particle swarm optimization (Palafox, Noman, & Iba, 2012;Tang, Chai, Wang, & Cao, 2020), among others. Also, many proposals exploit different parallelization strategies and infrastructures to solve these problems in competitive execution times (Adams et al, 2013;González et al, 2017;Lee, Hsiao, & Hwang, 2014;Penas, González, Egea, Banga and Doallo, 2015;Teijeiro et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the EGA was successfully applied for calibrating the parameters of AquaCrop and achieved satisfactory calibration and validation performance in this study, the use of EGA in crop models still has some problems that require further study. Avoiding being stuck in a local optimal solution is a common problem when using the search algorithm to find the global optimal solution (Trejo Zuniga et al, 2014), which still needs attention. The main advantage of the automatic calibration using a standard algorithm such as EGA is that the calibration is transparent and much less subject to non-documented decisions by the model user.…”
Section: Perspectives On Automatic Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used in crop yield forecasting, irrigation and field management decisions, and impact assessment of climate change on agriculture (Confalonieri et al, 2016). Crop models simulate many processes related to plant physiology and soil water and nutrient flows and transformations, which result in complex model structures, a large number of parameters, and nonlinear responses (Trejo Zuniga et al, 2014, Xi, Lu, Gui, Qi, & Zhang, 2017. These characteristics of crop models greatly affect the accuracy and efficiency of the model calibration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, crop growth models can provide detailed estimations of crop status, including phenological status, leaf area index ( LAI ), and yield of specific crop types 3 . Furthermore, these models can predict crop yields as a function of soil conditions, weather, and management practices 4 . Therefore, crop growth models have become important tools for quantitatively evaluating the relationships among soil, weather, and vegetation, and for facilitating the timely regulation of crop growth, which has attracted widespread attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%