2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2010.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation for Boolean models of biological networks

Abstract: Boolean networks have long been used as models of molecular networks and play an increasingly important role in systems biology. This paper describes a software package, Polynome, offered as a web service, that helps users construct Boolean network models based on experimental data and biological input. The key feature is a discrete analog of parameter estimation for continuous models. With only experimental data as input, the software can be used as a tool for reverse-engineering of Boolean network models fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This qualitative assumption allows the use of Boolean networks [83] in Type 4 inference problems. Expression values in Boolean network inference approaches are discretized mostly in two states, representing an activity level at each time point [84][85][86]. Regulatory connection inference algorithms try to find a binary function that computes the next state of a gene based on a combination of other genes' states using simple Boolean operations, e.g.…”
Section: Classification Of Inference Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This qualitative assumption allows the use of Boolean networks [83] in Type 4 inference problems. Expression values in Boolean network inference approaches are discretized mostly in two states, representing an activity level at each time point [84][85][86]. Regulatory connection inference algorithms try to find a binary function that computes the next state of a gene based on a combination of other genes' states using simple Boolean operations, e.g.…”
Section: Classification Of Inference Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several inference methods have one or several of the aforementioned features. Some of these methods fall in the category of coarse-grained models based on discrete variables, such as Boolean networks, Bayesian networks, Petri nets, and polynomial dynamical systems [ 19 - 25 ]; others correspond to fine-grained models based on continuous variables, such as systems of ordinary differential equations, artificial neural networks, hybrid Petri nets, and regression methods [ 26 - 32 ] (For a broad overview of the different methods in the field, we refer the reader to [ 33 - 35 ]). However, there is still a need for inference methods that gather all the previously mentioned properties, and for which their mathematical frameworks can be exploited to improve the methods’ performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally these techniques limit the indegree, , of a node to a small number like 3 or 4. Some examples of reconstruction algorithms include REVEAL, which is based on the information theoretic principle and has a time complexity factor a multiple of [11]; predictor chooser method of Ideker et al that uses minimum set covering [13]; minimal sets algorithm and genetic algorithms by Dimitrova et al [16] Monte-Carlo type randomized algorithm of Akutsu et al [12], which has an exponential time complexity. Best fit extension principle of Lähdesmäki et al again involves a factor of [14], where is the total number of nodes in the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%