2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation algorithms for Hammerstein output error systems using Levenberg–Marquardt optimization method with varying interval measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results show that the proposed algorithms can generate accurate estimates. The proposed approaches in the paper can combine other mathematical tools [64][65][66][67][68][69] and statistical strategies [70][71][72][73][74][75] to study the performances of some parameter estimation algorithms and can be applied to other multivariable systems with different structures and disturbance noises and other literature [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] such as system identification [87][88][89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results show that the proposed algorithms can generate accurate estimates. The proposed approaches in the paper can combine other mathematical tools [64][65][66][67][68][69] and statistical strategies [70][71][72][73][74][75] to study the performances of some parameter estimation algorithms and can be applied to other multivariable systems with different structures and disturbance noises and other literature [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] such as system identification [87][88][89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LM algorithm can be seen as a combination of the steepest gradient algorithm and the Newton algorithm (Li et al, 2017), providing point estimates. Short cadence data from Quarter 1 were downloaded for Kepler-1b, 5b, and 8b from the NEA website and folded using the given (NEA) system periods.…”
Section: Levenberg-marquadt (Lm) Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction oscillation is more obvious and has a greater impact on the prediction accuracy and stability. So the LM algorithm [24,25] was adopted to replace the gradient descent algorithm to optimize the weighting mechanism of the CDBN model, the information extraction stability of the model and the generalization ability of the nonlinear problem of the time-varying system are improved, the speed of the model convergence is accelerated, and the prediction accuracy and stability of the model are improved. Considering the complexity of the deformation of supertall buildings, the complexity of deformation factors, the deformation characteristics, and the advantages and disadvantages of the model, the LM-CDBN model was applied to the deformation prediction of the CITIC tower, and the prediction accuracy and stability of the proposed model are verified by model comparison experiments and predictive analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%