2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter determination of Chaboche kinematic hardening model using a multi objective Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is based on a decomposition of the non-linear kinematic hardening rule proposed by Armstrong and Frederik (1966). Chaboche decomposed a stable hysteresis curve in several parts, and it was observed that increasing the material parameters of the hardening rule by the superposition of backstresses, a more accurate model was obtained [49,50]. However, in this work only one backstress has been considered in the model definition because of many FE codes have only implemented the model with one backstress.…”
Section: Parameter Identification Of Mixed Chaboche and Lemaitre Hardmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This model is based on a decomposition of the non-linear kinematic hardening rule proposed by Armstrong and Frederik (1966). Chaboche decomposed a stable hysteresis curve in several parts, and it was observed that increasing the material parameters of the hardening rule by the superposition of backstresses, a more accurate model was obtained [49,50]. However, in this work only one backstress has been considered in the model definition because of many FE codes have only implemented the model with one backstress.…”
Section: Parameter Identification Of Mixed Chaboche and Lemaitre Hardmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A multi-set of nonlinear equations was established and then, the obtained equations were solved to determine the required parameters using an iterative technique such as Newton-Raphson approach. In other studies (Chaparro et al, 2008;Mahmoudi et al, 2011), genetic algorithm (GA) was used to minimize the difference between the numerical predictions and the experimental results when calibrating the NLKH models. However, FEMU has a drawback that it is time-consuming due to the iterative nature of the FE model updating process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of generating global optimisation techniques, such as implemented in [24,25], will also be investigated. However, to ensure that the strain-rate effect is captured accurately, it is imperative that any optimisation technique does not remove the physical basis of the current set of material parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%