Paramedic perspectives on sex and gender equity in prehospital electrocardiogram acquisition

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) makes up a substantial healthcare burden. Previous research has demonstrated that women fare worse than men across a range of hospital-based ACS processes and outcomes. In the prehospital setting, the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can identify critical ACS cases and speed access to definitive treatment. However, studies on rates of ECG acquisition among patients at risk of ACS in the prehospital setting have shown that women receive the test less frequently than men. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for observed gender differences in rates of ECG acquisition in the prehospital setting. This is a cross-sectional study of paramedics in an urban emergency medical service agency. An experienced qualitative researcher conducted 26 semi-structured interviews. Using a subjectivist inductive approach, the study team analyzed interview transcripts following the six-step process described by Braun and Clarke (2006). Qualitative rigor was maintained through consistent review, discussion, and revision at each stage. Four themes were identified among diverse views around the 12-lead acquisition. (1) Safety (feelings of physical comfort and psychological safety related to administering a 12-lead). (2) Knowledge (subject-matter knowledge involving the protocols and procedures as well as self-knowledge of participants’ own practice). (3) Training and learning (perceptions of foundational training and on-the-job learning, and how those have influenced their perceptions of how to care for patients experiencing ACS). (4) Professionalism (perceptions of behavior and attitudes and how they influence patient care). These four interrelated themes were integrated to represent a model of prehospital cardiac care. This study addressed a gap in the literature by documenting prehospital providers’ attitudes and beliefs around cardiac care. The resulting model of prehospital cardiac care offers both a template for evaluating the equity of current treatment and a road map for improvement.