1966
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9163(66)90858-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paramagnetic resonance in binary Eu(II) and Gd(III) compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a. The EPR spectral shape of EuO nanocrystals were similar to that of reported EuO (g = 2.01) [12]. On the other hand, experimental p value introduced g constant (2.003) was agreeable with theoretical p for the magnetic measurements.…”
Section: Epr Measurementssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3a. The EPR spectral shape of EuO nanocrystals were similar to that of reported EuO (g = 2.01) [12]. On the other hand, experimental p value introduced g constant (2.003) was agreeable with theoretical p for the magnetic measurements.…”
Section: Epr Measurementssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The EPR signal of the EuO nanocrystals changes under 130 K. It seems that the alteration is due to the change of the magnetic state of the Eu(II) nanocrystals [12]. We observed that the blocking temperature of EuO nanocrystal with polyurea was around 150 K. The EPR signal under 130 K might be affected by the magnetic state of EuO nanocrystals.…”
Section: Epr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We also consider the magnetic properties. The heavier members of the family belonging to GdN and EuO become antiferromagnetic (AFM), including GdP, GdAs, GdSb, and GdBi [17,22,[26][27][28] as well as EuSe and EuTe [4,11,[29][30][31][32][33]. EuS remains ferromagnetic with a lower T c and a second-neighbour coupling constant (J 2 ) which becomes negative but smaller than the nearest-neighbour coupling constant (J 1 ) [4,34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%