2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paramagnetic electronic susceptibility of the thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account that z = const, the differences between various curves illustrate the size effects. The abrupt changes of −E IMC vs. ρ are the manifestation of the quantum size effects which are caused by discretization of the Fermi surface in thin films and analogous changes in the density of states at the Fermi level [12]. In Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking into account that z = const, the differences between various curves illustrate the size effects. The abrupt changes of −E IMC vs. ρ are the manifestation of the quantum size effects which are caused by discretization of the Fermi surface in thin films and analogous changes in the density of states at the Fermi level [12]. In Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Eq. (4) χ p,y denotes the paramagnetic susceptibility of the charge carriers in thin film, whose explicit form has been derived in [12]. In order to avoid a redundant repetition of the formalism this susceptibility will not be characterized here.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of the matrix composition on depth was obtained by measuring the erosion speed and at the end of each analysis the depth of the erosion crater by means of a Tencor Alpha Step profilometer with a typical uncertainty of about 1 nm. The details are described elsewhere [ 27 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbol χ l,y denotes the paramagnetic susceptibility of the electrons in the ultrathin film, which has been derived elsewhere, 26,27 while χ 0 is the Pauli susceptibility of 2D system. The energy constant C in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localized spins reveal the effective gyromagnetic factor 28 where g S and g e are the gyromagnetic factors of localized spins without RKKY interaction and the free-electrons, respectively. τ F is the number of subbands, splitted due to the discretization of Fermi surface in thin film.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%