Encyclopedia of Magnetic Resonance 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paramagnetic Complexes in Solution: The NMR Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here again, the changes in the chemical shifts mainly affect the proton signals located in the vicinity of the paramagnetic ion, bearing a significant amount of spin density. 42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here again, the changes in the chemical shifts mainly affect the proton signals located in the vicinity of the paramagnetic ion, bearing a significant amount of spin density. 42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad etailed introduction to NMR spectroscopy of paramagnetic complexes is given in our previous works and elsewhere. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] In the case of Ln complexesw ith diamagnetic ligands, the pseudocontact shift (pcs), which originates form magnetic dipole-dipolei nteractions betweenu npaired fe lectrons and nuclear spins, is the dominant contribution to the hyperfine shift. For Ln complexes with axial symmetry, pcs is expressed by Equation (1) (point dipole approximation), in which c ax is the axial component of the magnetic susceptibility tensor, r is the lengtho fv ector which connects the nucleusa nd the unpaired electrons and q is the angle between the vector r and the magnetic easy axis.…”
Section: Nmr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple attempts to quantify the solution magnetism using the Evans method were unsuccessful (Evans, 1959); due to the low magnetic moments, only extremely small changes in chemical shift were observed and no quantitative data could be obtained. Sophisticated NMR methods are now available for the interpretation of paramagnetic complexes (Cremer & Burger, 2003;Kö hler, 2011). However, to date with these methods the NMR data could not be fitted to an equilibrium between a paramagnetic (tetrahedral) and a diamagnetic (square planar) complex, as has been done for related systems (Pignolet & Horrocks, 1969).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%