2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cc34051h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paramagnetic aluminium β-diketiminate

Abstract: The b-diketiminate ligand framework is shown to undergo reduction to form a neutral main group radical stabilized by spiroconjugation of the unpaired electron over the group 13 element centre. The synthesized paramagnetic complex was characterized by EPR spectroscopy and computational chemistry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of two distinct ligand redox states is likely related to electrostatic interactions with the cation, which localizes the additional negative charge. A similar situation is observed in related bis(ligand) complexes: in the case of neutral radical species [{PhB(m-NtBu) 2 } 2 M] (M = Al, Ga) [16] and [(b-diketiminate) 2 Al], [17] the unpaired electron is fully delocalized over the spirocyclic structure, while for the radical anions [{PhB(m-NtBu) 2 } 2 M À ] (M = Mg, Zn), localized spin density is observed owing to interaction with the cation. [18] As suggested by the CV measurements, compounds 3 react with an additional equivalent of Na amalgam to give the dianionic complexes [Na(THF) 3 ] 2 [(PhNNC(R)NNPh) 2 Zn] (R = p-tolyl, 4 a; R = tBu, 4 b), of which 4 b was crystallographically characterized (Figure 4; pertinent bond distances in Table 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The observation of two distinct ligand redox states is likely related to electrostatic interactions with the cation, which localizes the additional negative charge. A similar situation is observed in related bis(ligand) complexes: in the case of neutral radical species [{PhB(m-NtBu) 2 } 2 M] (M = Al, Ga) [16] and [(b-diketiminate) 2 Al], [17] the unpaired electron is fully delocalized over the spirocyclic structure, while for the radical anions [{PhB(m-NtBu) 2 } 2 M À ] (M = Mg, Zn), localized spin density is observed owing to interaction with the cation. [18] As suggested by the CV measurements, compounds 3 react with an additional equivalent of Na amalgam to give the dianionic complexes [Na(THF) 3 ] 2 [(PhNNC(R)NNPh) 2 Zn] (R = p-tolyl, 4 a; R = tBu, 4 b), of which 4 b was crystallographically characterized (Figure 4; pertinent bond distances in Table 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The molecular structure of 1 reveals that the Al–N1 and Al–N8 bond vectors lie along the axial directions and the Al–Cl1, Al–N4, and Al–N5 bonds form the equatorial plane in 1 (Figure 1). The axial Al–N bonds are elongated as compared to equatorial Al–N bonds by about 0.081 Å, similar to related pentacoordinated Al(III) compounds in the literature, 47,48 and both are significantly longer than the Al–N bonds in four-coordinate β-diketiminate aluminum dichlorides. 11 The Al–Cl bond length in 1 (2.143(1) Å) is somewhat shorter than that in Berben’s pentacoordinated aluminum chloride complex with two bidentate nitrogen ligands (2.191(1) Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The observation of two distinct ligand redox states is likely related to electrostatic interactions with the cation, which localizes the additional negative charge. A similar situation is observed in related bis(ligand) complexes: in the case of neutral radical species [PhB(μ-N t Bu) 2 ] 2 M (M = Al, Ga) [16] and (β-diketiminate) 2 Al [17] the unpaired electron is fully delocalized over the spirocyclic structure, while for the radical anions [PhB(μ-N t Bu) 2 ] 2 M -(M = Mg, Zn) localized spin density is observed due to interaction with the cation. [18] As suggested by the CV measurements, compounds 3 react with an additional equivalent of Na amalgam to give the dianionic complexes [Na(THF) 3 ] 2 [(PhNNC(R)NNPh) 2 Zn] (R = p-tolyl, 4a; R = t Bu, 4b), of which 4b was crystallographically characterized (Figure 4, pertinent bond distances in Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%