2015
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paralympic athletes with cerebral palsy display altered pacing strategies in distance‐deceived shuttle running trials

Abstract: This study investigated performance and physiology to understand pacing strategies in elite Paralympic athletes with cerebral palsy (CP). Six Paralympic athletes with CP and 13 able-bodied (AB) athletes performed two trials of eight sets of 10 shuttles (total 1600m). One trial was distance-deceived (DEC, 1000 m + 600 m) one trial was nondeceived (N-DEC, 1600 m). Time (s), heart rate (HR, bpm), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE, units), and electromyography of five bilateral muscles (EMG) were recorded for eac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An evidence‐based classification system is one that has a clearly stated purpose, being to minimize the impact of impairment on the outcome of competition, and that the methods used to assign class are based on empirical evidence . The most fundamental aspect of developing evidence‐based methods of classification is the quantification of the relationship between impairment and sports performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An evidence‐based classification system is one that has a clearly stated purpose, being to minimize the impact of impairment on the outcome of competition, and that the methods used to assign class are based on empirical evidence . The most fundamental aspect of developing evidence‐based methods of classification is the quantification of the relationship between impairment and sports performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The most fundamental aspect of developing evidence-based methods of classification is the quantification of the relationship between impairment and sports performance. [9][10][11][12][13] Para swimmers with limb deficiency, resulting from trauma or congenital birth defect, have reduced body surface area that impacts their ability to produce propulsive forces and minimize their resistance in the water. [14][15][16] The current classification system uses direct limb length measurements and body segment parameters (in cases of bilateral impairments) to determine the relative length of para swimmers' affected limb segments and summate a points score used for classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been evidenced in Para athletes with cerebral palsy that show neuromuscular irregularities towards the end of maximal exercise performance, including bilateral coactivation, atypical firing patterns and continuous irregular muscle activation 21 that negatively affects performance through the selection of a conservative pacing strategy. 22 The similar fatigue indexes for swimmers with different types of physical impairment in this study ( Figure 2I) suggests that classification should not account for this phenomenon, at least in the short-distance events, until further research defines the determining factors influencing pacing and fatigue profiles in these athletes during maximal swimming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As regards quality assessment results, 28 papers had a quality score between 0.81 and 1 [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ], 10 papers were between 0.61 and 0.8 [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ] and only one paper was below 0.6 [ 74 ]. Overall, the checklist items that reported the lower levels of scoring (e.g., partial or no score) were those concerning (a) the adequacy of sample size (16 papers), (b) the description/appropriateness of the strategy of subject/comparison group selection (10 papers).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%