2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallels between spacing effects during behavioral and cellular learning

Abstract: Repeated learning improves memory. Temporally distributed (“spaced”) learning can be twice as efficient than massed learning. Importantly, learning success is a non-monotonic maximum function of the spacing interval between learning units. Further optimal spacing intervals seem to exist at different time scales from seconds to days. We briefly review the current state of knowledge about this “spacing effect” and then discuss very similar but so far little noticed spacing patterns during a form of synaptic plas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, continuous stimulation with auditory cues can be problematic because of a certain refractoriness pattern: Auditory stimulus presentation needs to be below a certain temporal duration 33 and spaced in time within the SWS stage in order to prevent the disappearance of the beneficial effect of cueing. The latter strongly reminds of well-known spacing effects 15,[34][35][36] or retroactive interference effects during learning 16 . Our continuous odor stimulation during night shows that the refractoriness problem is at least not that severe in the olfactory domain.…”
Section: Do Odor Cues During Sleep Improve Both Memory Consolidation supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, continuous stimulation with auditory cues can be problematic because of a certain refractoriness pattern: Auditory stimulus presentation needs to be below a certain temporal duration 33 and spaced in time within the SWS stage in order to prevent the disappearance of the beneficial effect of cueing. The latter strongly reminds of well-known spacing effects 15,[34][35][36] or retroactive interference effects during learning 16 . Our continuous odor stimulation during night shows that the refractoriness problem is at least not that severe in the olfactory domain.…”
Section: Do Odor Cues During Sleep Improve Both Memory Consolidation supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Given that all of these factors (except the first) could have introduced additional "experimental noise" into our data, it is remarkable that our effect sizes with Cohen's d between 0.6 and 1.2 are in the same range as, or larger than the effect size (d ≈ 0.6) in Rasch et al 's study 15 (we have estimated this value from the leftmost graph of their Fig. 2A).…”
Section: Real Life Settings and Effect Sizes Leaving The Experimentamentioning
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, with no spacing at all the stimuli simply combine additively into a single stimulus of increased amplitude. “Massed” stimuli, however, do not generally produce the same effects as spaced stimuli, a difference that is consistently observed on multiple time scales of behavioral learning and its cellular analogs (Kornmeier and Sosic-Vasic, 2012; Smolen et al, 2016). Thus, neuronal learning depends on the specific temporal relationships between the time windows of first messenger availability.…”
Section: Synergy Of Time Windows: Transient-to-persistent Conversionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain (Kornmeier and Sosic-Vasic, 2012). Glutamate is found in substantially higher concentrations than monoamines and in more than 80% of neurons, cementing its role as a major excitatory synaptic neurotransmitter.…”
Section: Glutamatementioning
confidence: 99%