All Days 2009
DOI: 10.2118/118684-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelization of a Commercial Streamline Simulator and Performance on Practical Models

Abstract: We present the extension of a serial execution commercial streamline simulator to mulit-core architectures based on the OpenMP programming model and its performance on various field examples. This work is an extension of recent work by Gerritsen et al. (2008) in which a research streamline simulator was extended for parallel execution due to its intrinsically parallel algorithm.We identified that the streamline-transport step represents the bulk of the run time (65%-85%). It is exactly this step that is straig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless particular difficulties are present in the original Jacobian system, AMG is an established, highly efficient strategy for solving IMPES-like total-pressure equations (Batycky et al 2009;Geiger et al 2009); thus, AMG should be an efficient choice for the quasi-IMPES pressure equation as well. In fact, because the Jacobian's "elliptic parts" are concentrated inà pp (Masson et al 2004), this resulting pressure equation can be expected to have comparable properties.…”
Section: Drs Preconditionermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unless particular difficulties are present in the original Jacobian system, AMG is an established, highly efficient strategy for solving IMPES-like total-pressure equations (Batycky et al 2009;Geiger et al 2009); thus, AMG should be an efficient choice for the quasi-IMPES pressure equation as well. In fact, because the Jacobian's "elliptic parts" are concentrated inà pp (Masson et al 2004), this resulting pressure equation can be expected to have comparable properties.…”
Section: Drs Preconditionermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because AMG methods are able to efficiently deal with complex geometries, with discontinuous and varying coefficients, and with anisotropies, they are naturally very attractive for porous-media-flow simulation with its varying permeability fields and resulting heterogeneities. Finally, because AMG in its classical form does not require geometric information, it is also easily integrated into existing reservoir simulators Batycky et al 2009). Hence, in recent years, AMG has become the most popular choice for the pressure-preconditioning step in reservoir-simulation applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For solving IMPES-like total pressure equations AMG already is successfully applied [4][15], so AMG should be an efficient choice for the quasi-IMPES pressure equation, as well. In fact, since the Jacobian's 'elliptic parts' are concentrated in à pp [22], this resulting pressure equation can be expected to have comparable properties.…”
Section: Dynamic Rowsum (Drs) Preconditionermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Streamline simulation is an attractive alternative to overcome the drawbacks in conventional finite difference simulations, since it offers substantial computational efficiency while minimizing numerical diffusion and gridorientation effects [4]. A total of 300 seismic inversion realizations are flow simulated using parallel simulation algorithms [5] over 8 CPUs. Instead of moving fluids from cell to cell, streamline simulation breaks up the reservoir into 1D systems, or tubes.…”
Section: Flow Simulation Parameterization and Streamline Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%