1997
DOI: 10.1137/s0097539794265402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelism Always Helps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, there is evidence that large amounts of parallelism is available for almost any kind of problems if a strong enough model of computation (e.g. PRAM) is implemented [24] [22] [36]. This leaves a seamless support for the legacy code the most important motivation for including the full NUMA support for future ESM CMPs.…”
Section: Support Full Numamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there is evidence that large amounts of parallelism is available for almost any kind of problems if a strong enough model of computation (e.g. PRAM) is implemented [24] [22] [36]. This leaves a seamless support for the legacy code the most important motivation for including the full NUMA support for future ESM CMPs.…”
Section: Support Full Numamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the NC = P question asks if polynomial time computations can be captured by (log n) O(1) depth, bounded fan-in, polynomial size circuits. Over the years, numerous parallel simulations have been given for speeding up general (serial) computational models [13,14,3,9,10,8], each of which can be interpreted as a Boolean circuit family, where the number of processors in the parallel algorithm is polynomially related to the circuit size of the family. However, no known parallel simulation achieves an ω(1) speedup (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only result we could find directly addressing this question is from Mak [10] in 1997, who shows a time t RAM can be sped up to εt + n by a CREW PRAM of t O(1) processors, for ε > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%