2012
DOI: 10.1021/ja3074962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel β-Sheet Vibrational Couplings Revealed by 2D IR Spectroscopy of an Isotopically Labeled Macrocycle: Quantitative Benchmark for the Interpretation of Amyloid and Protein Infrared Spectra

Abstract: Infrared spectroscopy is playing an important role in the elucidation of amyloid fiber formation, but the coupling models that link spectra to structure are not well tested for parallel β-sheets. Using a synthetic macrocycle that enforces a two stranded parallel β-sheet conformation, we measured the lifetimes and frequency for six combinations of doubly 13C=18O labeled amide I modes using 2D IR spectroscopy. The average vibrational lifetime of the isotope labeled residues was 550 fs. The frequen cies of the la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
143
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
8
143
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, direct comparison between simulated and experimental spectra has been generally limited to analysis of peak widths 41,66 (rather than frequencies) or is accompanied by arbitrary peak shifts of up to 30 cm −1 in order to improve agreement between simulation and experiment. 11,26,39,40 A particular difficulty appears to be the assignment of 13 44,45,67 or assumed 12,41,42 in various applications in the literature. In the absence of a well-defined shift, the absolute frequencies of isotope labeled units do not appear to us to be a meaningful metric for map performance, although relative frequency shifts between different isotope labels within the same peptide can, of course, provide a qualitative comparison.…”
Section: Outlook For Amide I Spectroscopic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past, direct comparison between simulated and experimental spectra has been generally limited to analysis of peak widths 41,66 (rather than frequencies) or is accompanied by arbitrary peak shifts of up to 30 cm −1 in order to improve agreement between simulation and experiment. 11,26,39,40 A particular difficulty appears to be the assignment of 13 44,45,67 or assumed 12,41,42 in various applications in the literature. In the absence of a well-defined shift, the absolute frequencies of isotope labeled units do not appear to us to be a meaningful metric for map performance, although relative frequency shifts between different isotope labels within the same peptide can, of course, provide a qualitative comparison.…”
Section: Outlook For Amide I Spectroscopic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, label pairs should be intentionally chosen both to have stable structures (e.g., larger peptides than in some previous studies 68,69 ) and to have significant coupling constants since experimental validation of a coupling constant less than a few wavenumbers in the presence of tens of wavenumbers of disorder is not practically feasible (see, e.g., Ref. 42). …”
Section: Outlook For Amide I Spectroscopic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14). The canonical transformations between these sets of variables must be determined, as must transformations between the phase space variables used in the OMT diagrams and the action-angle variables in which the quantization conditions are imposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reveal a maximally detailed picture of both structure and dynamics, these response function calculations should treat atomistic models. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Numerically exact quantum dynamical calculations of response functions are generally impractical while purely classical calculations may be qualitatively incorrect except at the shortest time scales. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] These challenges motivate the development of approximate methods for computing response functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%