2021
DOI: 10.1051/mmnp/2021005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel time-stepping for fluid–structure interactions

Abstract: We present a parallel time-stepping method for fluid-structure   interactions. The interaction between the incompressible   Navier-Stokes equations and a hyperelastic solid is formulated in a   fully monolithic framework. Discretization in space is based on   equal order finite element for all variables and a variant of the   Crank-Nicolson scheme is used as second order time integrator. To   accelerate the solution of the systems, we analyze a parallel-in   time method. For different numerical test cas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that this defect stems from a complicated interplay of temporal dissipation and spatial discretization. For a discussion we refer to [36] and also to [37] where the same effect is observed for a parallel time stepping scheme. In the context of the deep neural network multigrid approach it must be investigated if this problem can be resolved by training with high fidelity solutions that come from discretizations that are finer in space and in time, i.e., by working with a finer time step.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this defect stems from a complicated interplay of temporal dissipation and spatial discretization. For a discussion we refer to [36] and also to [37] where the same effect is observed for a parallel time stepping scheme. In the context of the deep neural network multigrid approach it must be investigated if this problem can be resolved by training with high fidelity solutions that come from discretizations that are finer in space and in time, i.e., by working with a finer time step.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this defect stems from a complicated interplay of temporal dissipation and spatial discretization. For a discussion we refer to [34] and also to [35] where the same effect is observed for a parallel time stepping scheme. In the context of the deep neural network multigrid approach it must be investigated if this problem can be resolved by training with high fidelity solutions that come from discretizations that are finer in space and in time, i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This shift in frequency and phase as a function of mesh resolution prevents a direct comparison of results obtained on different levels in a multigrid-type algorithm such as DNN-MG. In [35], a shifted variant of the Crank-Nicolson scheme is discussed to remedy the problem. Since this cannot be used directly for DNN-MG, we instead compare the functional values in shifted intervals [t * , t * + 1], where t * is chosen as the first peak in the lift functional after time t = 9s, identified separately for the coarse mesh solution, DNN-MG and the fine mesh one on level L + 1.…”
Section: Flow Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%