2009
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel sequencing used in detection of mosaic mutations: Comparison with four diagnostic DNA screening techniques

Abstract: We have made an evaluation of mutation detection techniques for their abilities to detect mosaic mutations. In this study, Sanger sequencing, single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)/heteroduplex analysis (HD), protein truncation test (PTT), and denaturating high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) were compared with parallel sequencing. In total DNA samples from nine patients were included in this study. Mosaic mutations were artificially constructed from seven of these samples, which were from he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
126
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
126
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although the assessed sensitivity for point mutation detection in mosaics of cells may vary according to different mutation types, the techniques used in this study can detect very low levels of mosaic mutations, such as 5% of mutated cells for DHPLC and 15% for direct sequencing (Rohlin et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the assessed sensitivity for point mutation detection in mosaics of cells may vary according to different mutation types, the techniques used in this study can detect very low levels of mosaic mutations, such as 5% of mutated cells for DHPLC and 15% for direct sequencing (Rohlin et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the screening results are negative, sequencing of the whole mitochondrial genome is performed to find causative rare variants or novel mutations. Although the gold standard, Sanger sequencing, reliably detects most nucleotide changes, it does not provide quantitative information and is not adequately sensitive for detecting mutant heteroplasmy below 15% (11 ). Large mtDNA deletions are analyzed separately by Southern blotting (12 ) or by custom-designed array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) (13,14 ).…”
Section: © 2012 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Although specific primers or probes can be designed for the quantification of target positions, 7,22 it is laborious to validate the method for every novel mtDNA point mutation. In addition, primers may contain modifications and probes that are specific for either the wild-type or mutant allele, [23][24][25] thus, a difference in PCR amplification efficiency for these two alleles is expected, leading to inherent inaccuracies with the measurement of the degree of heteroplasmy.…”
Section: Low-level Mutation Heteroplasmy and Its Clinical And Geneticmentioning
confidence: 99%