Parallel Combinatorial Optimization 2006
DOI: 10.1002/9780470053928.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Semidefinite Programming and Combinatorial Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By introducing parallel processing in the parts where bottlenecks have occurred in conventional software packages, we have also succeeded in making substantial reductions to the overall computation times. We have conducted numerical experiments to compare the performance of SDPARA-C with that of SDPARA [28] and PDSDP [1] in a variety of different problems. From the results of these experiments, we have verified that SDPARA-C exhibits very high scalability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By introducing parallel processing in the parts where bottlenecks have occurred in conventional software packages, we have also succeeded in making substantial reductions to the overall computation times. We have conducted numerical experiments to compare the performance of SDPARA-C with that of SDPARA [28] and PDSDP [1] in a variety of different problems. From the results of these experiments, we have verified that SDPARA-C exhibits very high scalability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second was SDPARA [28]. The third was PDSDP, as used in the numerical experiments of the paper [1], which employs the dual interior-point method on parallel CPUs. In all the experiments apart from those described in section 4.5, the starting point of the interior-point method was chosen to be X = Y = 100I, z = 0.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%