2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2020.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel rewriting of attributed graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of course possible to extend Definition 3 accordingly (see [1, 11.3] for the general definition of a limit). It would then be easy to prove that cellular automata can be represented by PCTs, with a single production rule (see also [4,Theorem 6.3]).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is of course possible to extend Definition 3 accordingly (see [1, 11.3] for the general definition of a limit). It would then be easy to prove that cellular automata can be represented by PCTs, with a single production rule (see also [4,Theorem 6.3]).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work stems from [4] where an algorithmic framework is proposed for rule-based deterministic parallel transformations of graphs whose vertices and arrows are mapped to sets of attributes. The rules are triples pL, K, Rq where K is a subgraph of L and the intersection of L and R (that stands for the object I in a weak span) is a subgraph of K. Parallel coherence is replaced with a more general effective deletion property that distinguishes graph items (vertices and arrows) from attributes.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that Definition 5.2 provides the expected characterization of sequential independence. The (rather long) proof of Theorem 5.3 can be found in [5].…”
Section: Parallel Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…M (x) = ∅ and therefore M has the effective deletion property. It has been shown in [5] that =⇒ R is deterministic up to isomorphism, that is, if G =⇒ R H, G ′ =⇒ R H ′ and G ≃ G ′ then H ≃ H ′ . In particular, it is possible to represent any cellular automaton by a suitable rule r and a class of graphs that correspond to configurations of the automaton (every vertex corresponds to a cell), such that =⇒ r (restricted to such graphs) is the transition function of the automaton.…”
Section: Parallel Rewritingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation