1996
DOI: 10.1109/2.546612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel programming with Polaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
115
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Symbolic dependence analysis has been the subject of several studies [14,[18][19][20], mainly for the purpose of achieving powerful dependence testing, array privatization and generalized induction variable substitution, especially in the context of parallelizing compilers such as Polaris [5] and SUIF [17]. This body of work differs from the work presented in this paper in that our compiler does not focus on dependence testing, or try to statically find independent statements, in order to parallelize them.…”
Section: Related Workcontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Symbolic dependence analysis has been the subject of several studies [14,[18][19][20], mainly for the purpose of achieving powerful dependence testing, array privatization and generalized induction variable substitution, especially in the context of parallelizing compilers such as Polaris [5] and SUIF [17]. This body of work differs from the work presented in this paper in that our compiler does not focus on dependence testing, or try to statically find independent statements, in order to parallelize them.…”
Section: Related Workcontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…We implemented the tiling algorithm presented in Section 4 in the Polaris [6,13] parallelizing compiler. The experiments were done on an Ultra SPARC II machine with four 250 MHZ processors.…”
Section: Experimental Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OpenMP [4], OpenACC [5]), on parallel programming languages (e.g. PGAS languages), and on parallelizing compilers that automatically rewrite sequential programs into a parallel counterpart [6,7,8,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%