1989
DOI: 10.1037/h0084213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel perceptual/cognitive functions in humans and rats: Space and time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our results provided confirmation of latent spatial learning in the Morris Water Maze, the argument that these visually experienced LR animals recognized and used the information about the correct platform location and its relationship to distal cues in the room would have been more persuasive if we were able to demonstrate not only positive transfer, but also negative transfer for animals being tested under Condition B (Incorrect Location) in comparison to animals (Condition C) placed on a platform in an entirely different environment. See Church & Meck (1983) and Tees and Buhrmann (1989) for further discussions. While we did not observe differences between LR and DR rats' behavior (e.g., in rearing) during preexposure, we are currently beginning to do a more sophisticated analysis of the movements of differentially reared and lesioned animals during such preexposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our results provided confirmation of latent spatial learning in the Morris Water Maze, the argument that these visually experienced LR animals recognized and used the information about the correct platform location and its relationship to distal cues in the room would have been more persuasive if we were able to demonstrate not only positive transfer, but also negative transfer for animals being tested under Condition B (Incorrect Location) in comparison to animals (Condition C) placed on a platform in an entirely different environment. See Church & Meck (1983) and Tees and Buhrmann (1989) for further discussions. While we did not observe differences between LR and DR rats' behavior (e.g., in rearing) during preexposure, we are currently beginning to do a more sophisticated analysis of the movements of differentially reared and lesioned animals during such preexposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this literature most of the disruptive influences on later learning result from depriving animals of specific early experiences, not from presenting more early experiences. For example, Tees and Buhrmann (1989) found that visually inexperienced (dark-reared) rats were slower at acquiring a discrimination involving spatial location of visual events under some stimulus-response arrangements when compared to animals raised in the light, one of many important results of this kind produced by Tees and his colleagues (e.g., Tees, 1994). Moreover, there have been few.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%