2019
DOI: 10.1002/cne.24775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel organization of the avian sensorimotor arcopallium: Tectofugal visual pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia)

Abstract: The sensory–motor division of the avian arcopallium receives parallel inputs from primary and high‐order pallial areas of sensory and vocal control pathways, and sends a prominent descending projection to ascending and premotor, subpallial stages of these pathways. While this organization is well established for the auditory and trigeminal systems, the arcopallial subdivision related to the tectofugal visual system and its descending projection to the optic tectum (TeO) has been less investigated. In this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
6
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas RA receives input from HVC and from the LMAN core, the latter projection connecting the anterior forebrain and vocal-motor pathways, AId receives input from the LMAN shell and from the dorsal caudolateral nidopallium (dNCL) lateral to HVC 50 , 51 , 71 , 77 . The projection from dNCL to AId appears to be topographic 5 , 51 , 71 , 77 suggesting that a topographic organization might also be present in a medial to lateral map in AId, with possible somatotopy. Furthermore, both RA and AId are part of the intermediate arcopallium, which originates descending somatic projections 38 and is considered part of a general motor pathway 32 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Whereas RA receives input from HVC and from the LMAN core, the latter projection connecting the anterior forebrain and vocal-motor pathways, AId receives input from the LMAN shell and from the dorsal caudolateral nidopallium (dNCL) lateral to HVC 50 , 51 , 71 , 77 . The projection from dNCL to AId appears to be topographic 5 , 51 , 71 , 77 suggesting that a topographic organization might also be present in a medial to lateral map in AId, with possible somatotopy. Furthermore, both RA and AId are part of the intermediate arcopallium, which originates descending somatic projections 38 and is considered part of a general motor pathway 32 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the pigeon, zebra finch, and mallard, the NFT has been shown to be the source of long‐range projections to several other pallial areas, such as the somato‐motor arcopallium, and the associative, or higher order, caudal nidopallium. These connections could be compared to the ones arising from the NI, the intermediate layer of the visual DVR, which has recently been shown to be sole source of the long‐range intrapallial projections of the visual DVR complex (Fernández, Ahumada‐Galleguillos, et al, 2020; Fernández, Morales, et al, 2020). Establishing to what extent NFT and NI share similar structural and functional traits becomes of high interest and should be studied further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this evidence, the forming layers of the sensory DVR consist of continuous fields of characteristic cell types, that extends along the whole rostro-caudal axis of the anterior DVR (Figure 3; Chen et al, 2013;Jarvis et al, 2013). In each domain receiving primary sensory afferents, the ventral most senso-recipient layer (trigeminal, Bas; (Fern andez, Ahumada-Galleguillos, et al, 2020;Fern andez, Morales, et al, 2020;Wild et al, 1985Wild et al, , 1993. Regarding projections toward the basal ganglia, as stated above two, different sources of efferents have been described in the tectovisual and trigeminal area (current study): one originated in the intermediate layer (NI and NFT) and another originated in the ventral division of the senso-recipient layer (ventral E and ventral Bas;Ahumada-Galleguillos et al, 2015;Fern andez, Ahumada-Galleguillos, et al, 2020;Krützfeldt & Wild, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although this activity could be related to head movements, which we did not score comprehensively, another possibility is that activity in these neurons relates to non-motor factors such as visual processing, attention, or arousal (Knudsen et al, 1995;Rauske et al, 2003;Cardin and Schmidt, 2004;Winkowski and Knudsen, 2007;Fernández et al, 2020).…”
Section: How Does Activity During Scored Movements Contribute To Behamentioning
confidence: 99%