2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4lc00642a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel microfluidic chemosensitivity testing on individual slice cultures

Abstract: There is a critical unmet need to tailor chemotherapies to individual patients. Personalized approaches could lower treatment toxicity, improve the patient’s quality of life, and ultimately reduce mortality. However, existing models of drug activity (based on tumor cells in culture or animal models) cannot accurately predict how drugs act in patients in time to inform the best possible treatment. Here we demonstrate a microfluidic device that integrates live slice cultures with an intuitive multi well platform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The embedded tumour sections retain the tumour vasculature, nearby stroma and the heterogeneity of the tumour cells. Microfluidic technology can be combined with an ex vivo tumour section culture system for parallel drug sensitivity testing while maintaining continuous control over culture conditions [35].…”
Section: Ex Vivo Tumour Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embedded tumour sections retain the tumour vasculature, nearby stroma and the heterogeneity of the tumour cells. Microfluidic technology can be combined with an ex vivo tumour section culture system for parallel drug sensitivity testing while maintaining continuous control over culture conditions [35].…”
Section: Ex Vivo Tumour Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a single tissue sample has been treated sequentially with many different drugs [30]. However, the goal of having a large number of tissue perifusion chambers each with its own perfusate supply to facilitate the testing of for instance 96 drugs on 96 separate tissue samples using lithography has not been previously developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of cell separation technology with single-cell imaging and analysis techniques can tremendously improve screening and diagnosis of cancers. [73,74] Microfluidics present several advantages for these types of assays including minimal reagent usage, high-throughput screening, and single-cell analysis using lesser amounts of sample on the scale of 1–3000 cells alone. [68] Processing strategies such as microfluidic flow cytometry allows for single-cell measurements that confirm intratumoral heterogeneity of common tumor signaling pathways and can be validated by immunohistochemical processing of the same tissue samples.…”
Section: Microfluidic Technologies For Gbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[88] Other devices incorporating slice cultures into multiwell platforms can be used to develop personalized therapies and evaluate the effects of different drugs and treatment conditions on tumor progression. [73] Compartmentalized or multichannel microfluidic devices incorporating gradient generators, regulators of fluid flow, and other tunable parameters enable the detailed characterization of the migratory behavior of tumor cells, help study tumor recurrence and metastasis, and facilitate the efficacy testing of glioma-specific anticancer agents. [89] In another example, microenvironment-specific chemokine gradients were constructed within a microfluidic device to study the anticancer drug efficacy and penetration into the tumor bulk.…”
Section: Microfluidic Technologies For Gbmmentioning
confidence: 99%