18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2004.1302904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel maximum weight bipartite matching algorithms for scheduling in input-queued switches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using MWM (Maximum Weighted Matching) as crossbar schedules is known to result in 100% switch throughput and near-optimal queueing delays under various traffic patterns [15], but each MWM takes O(N 2.5 log W ) time to compute using the state-of-theart algorithm [4], where W is the maximum possible length of a VOQ. Motivated by this, various parallel exact or approximate MWM algorithms (e.g., [2,5]) have been proposed to reduce its time complexity. However, the time complexities of all these algorithms above are still too high to be used in high-line-rate high-radix switches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using MWM (Maximum Weighted Matching) as crossbar schedules is known to result in 100% switch throughput and near-optimal queueing delays under various traffic patterns [15], but each MWM takes O(N 2.5 log W ) time to compute using the state-of-theart algorithm [4], where W is the maximum possible length of a VOQ. Motivated by this, various parallel exact or approximate MWM algorithms (e.g., [2,5]) have been proposed to reduce its time complexity. However, the time complexities of all these algorithms above are still too high to be used in high-line-rate high-radix switches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most representative among them are [19,[27][28][29]. A parallel algorithm with a sub-linear per-node computational complexity of O( √ N log 2 N ) was proposed in [27] for computing MWM exactly in a bipartite graph. However, this algorithm requires the use of O(N 3 ) processors.…”
Section: Parallel/distributed Mwm Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time complexity of this algorithm can be reduced to O(log n) using the O(1) parallel selection algorithm described in [6] with O(n 4 ) processing elements using a CRCW PRAM model. This O(log n) parallel algorithm is also described in [7].…”
Section: Providing a Basis Feasible Sets And Nc-search Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%