2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel machine scheduling problem with preemptive jobs and transportation delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of this new linear formulation, we have executed it on 270 instances generated according to the intervals used in Shams and Salmasi (2014). For each configuration (n, m), 30 instances are generated by taking the processing times in [1, 10], [1,40] and [1 III.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the performance of this new linear formulation, we have executed it on 270 instances generated according to the intervals used in Shams and Salmasi (2014). For each configuration (n, m), 30 instances are generated by taking the processing times in [1, 10], [1,40] and [1 III.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our investigation concerning the solution of the general problem on m machines, we realized that except for some heuristics present in Boudhar and Haned (2009), all problem solving approaches found in the literature are exact. We quote essentially algorithms presented by Shams and Salmasi (2014). These exact algorithms are applicable only on the small and the medium sized-instances (not exceeding 100 jobs).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Balin proposed a new genetic algorithm revised from an optimum criterion and new crossover operator, and then verify the efficiency of proposed algorithm by simulating result [7]. Moreover, some other algorithms also respect to solve the parallel machine scheduling problem [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%