1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8191(97)00039-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel line integral convolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, following researches tried to improve the performance of the original LIC algorithm ( [7], [8], [9], [10]). Later, van Wijk [11] proposed a different technique for two-dimensional flow visualization, named Image Based Flow Visualization (IBFV), which presented much better performance if compared to the traditional LIC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, following researches tried to improve the performance of the original LIC algorithm ( [7], [8], [9], [10]). Later, van Wijk [11] proposed a different technique for two-dimensional flow visualization, named Image Based Flow Visualization (IBFV), which presented much better performance if compared to the traditional LIC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early examples include the use of multiprocessor workstations, such as Cray C90, Convex C3240, and SGI systems, to parallelize particle tracing [11,12]. There are also a few research efforts focusing on parallel line integral convolution (LIC) [4,30]. More recently, Muraki et al [17] presented a scalable PC cluster system for enabling simultaneous volume computation and visualization, which includes 3D time-varying LIC volumes for animation.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several seed point selection techniques have been proposed, especially for the computation of LIC images, such as selecting points in the scanline order, dividing images into blocks or using Sobol quasi random sequences [12]. We use the following algorithm.…”
Section: Seed Point Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%