2023
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1232514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel G-quadruplex recognition by neomycin

Nihar Ranjan,
Dev P. Arya

Abstract: G-quadruplex-forming nucleic acids have evolved to have applications in biology, drug design, sensing, and nanotechnology, to name a few. Together with the structural understanding, several attempts have been made to discover and design new classes of chemical agents that target these structures in the hope of using them as future therapeutics. Here, we report the binding of aminoglycosides, in particular neomycin, to parallel G-quadruplexes that exist as G-quadruplex monomers, dimers, or compounds that have t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate this, a competition experiment was conducted using three G4-specific ligands: PDS, IMT, and neomycin. PDS and IMT both bind to the terminal G-tetrads of G4s, , while neomycin binds to the G4 grooves . The affinity constant of SCY-5 for G4s is only 10 3 –10 5 M –1 (Figure S23), which is weaker than the affinity constants of most G4 ligands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate this, a competition experiment was conducted using three G4-specific ligands: PDS, IMT, and neomycin. PDS and IMT both bind to the terminal G-tetrads of G4s, , while neomycin binds to the G4 grooves . The affinity constant of SCY-5 for G4s is only 10 3 –10 5 M –1 (Figure S23), which is weaker than the affinity constants of most G4 ligands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PDS and IMT both bind to the terminal G-tetrads of G4s, 47,48 while neomycin binds to the G4 grooves. 49 The affinity constant of SCY-5 for G4s is only 10 3 −10 5 M −1 (Figure S23), which is weaker than the affinity constants of most G4 ligands. If the binding sites are the same, the SCY-5 bound to G4s would be displaced by these ligands through competition.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%