2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Evolution in the Integration of a Co-obligate Aphid Symbiosis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
86
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
8
86
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its strict vertical transmission, Buchnera has undergone long-term coevolution with its aphid hosts [5]. However, due to the metabolic losses caused by rapid genome deterioration in Buchnera [6], some aphid species of the subfamilies Lachninae, Chaitophorinae, and Aphidinae have established co-obligate associations with other symbiotic partners [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its strict vertical transmission, Buchnera has undergone long-term coevolution with its aphid hosts [5]. However, due to the metabolic losses caused by rapid genome deterioration in Buchnera [6], some aphid species of the subfamilies Lachninae, Chaitophorinae, and Aphidinae have established co-obligate associations with other symbiotic partners [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence suggested that Serratia has evolved into a co-obligate symbiont with Buchnera. As an integrated unit, they function collectively in many aphid species, such as the Periphyllus genus, to synthesize and express essential nutrients-provisioning genes that are lost in Buchnera [ 45 ]. Co-obligate symbionts are located within the same bacteriome, and removal of Serratia had the most dramatic effect on aphid survival and reproduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now established that intracellular host-dependent symbionts of insects can evolve from originally free-living bacterial lineages (Husník et al 2011;Clayton et al 2012;Manzano-Marıń et al 2020). Genetic analyses indicate that these intimate relationships between insects and bacteria can evolve in a very dynamic fashion involving the recruitment of new bacterial partners and the repeated replacement of pre-existing intracellular symbionts (Koga and Moran 2014;Husnik and McCutcheon 2016;Meseguer et al 2017;Monnin et al 2020;Mao and Bennett 2020). Symbiont switching is an important evolutionary mechanism, which is not limited to insects (e.g., in reef organisms such as corals and sponges) (Webster and Reusch 2017), and by which maladaptive symbionts are replaced by new functional ones (Sudakaran et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, a growing number of studies have recently shown that symbiotic associations between insects and bacteria evolve in a very dynamic fashion, involving the acquisition of new symbionts, and/or the loss and replacement of established bacterial partners, even in the context of obligate associations established sometimes for millions of years (Koga and Moran 2014;Hosokawa et al 2016;Husnik and McCutcheon 2016;Manzano-Marín et al 2017;Sudakaran et al 2017;Chong and Moran 2018;Matsuura et al 2018;Mao and Bennett 2020). For example, genomic analyses in aphids indicate that the dependence of some species on co-obligate symbiotic bacteria has arisen independently many times during their evolutionary history , 2017Meseguer et al 2017;Manzano-Marıń et al 2020;Monnin et al 2020). The repeated replacement of pre-existing symbionts by other microbial partners is now considered a redundant evolutionary process that occurs in many insect species, suggesting 1) the continuous formation of new mutualistic associations in nature, and 2) the existence of a pool of environmental symbionts from which new intimate, facultative, or obligate associations are formed in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%