Adaptations are constructed through the sequential substitution of beneficial mutations by natural selection. However, the rarity of beneficial mutations has precluded efforts to describe even their most basic properties. Do beneficial mutations typically confer small or large fitness gains? Are their fitness effects environment specific, or are they broadly beneficial across a range of environments? To answer these questions, we used two subsets (n ¼ 18 and n ¼ 63) of a large library of mutants carrying antibiotic resistance mutations in the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens whose fitness, along with the antibiotic sensitive ancestor, was assayed across 95 novel environments differing in the carbon source available for growth. We explore patterns of genotype-byenvironment (G·E) interactions and ecological specialization among the 18 mutants initially found superior to the sensitive ancestor in one environment. We find that G·E is remarkably similar between the two sets of mutants and that beneficial mutants are not typically associated with large costs of adaptation. Fitness effects among beneficial mutants depart from a strict exponential distribution: they assume a variety of shapes that are often roughly L shaped but always right truncated. Distributions of (beneficial) fitness effects predicted by a landscape model assuming multiple traits underlying fitness and a single optimum often provide a good description of the empirical distributions in our data. Simulations of data sets containing a mixture of single and double mutants under this landscape show that inferences about the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutants is quite robust to contamination by second-site mutations.
BENEFICIAL mutations provide the raw material for adaptive evolution. Yet little is known about the properties of beneficial mutations because population genetics theory has placed far more emphasis on understanding the more abundant class of deleterious mutations (Eyre-Walker and Keightley 2007). The reason for this derives largely from arguments for the importance of neutrality in molecular evolution, which posit that beneficial mutations should be so rare that they would almost never be seen in nature. The result is a rich body of theory on the importance of deleterious mutations for the evolution of genetic systems such as ploidy, recombination, and life cycles. However, the theory has been comparatively silent on beneficial mutations, the "stuff" of adaptive evolution (Orr 2005).The realization that a genuinely predictive theory of evolution must be able to accommodate all mutationswhether they be deleterious, neutral, or beneficial-has led to attempts on both the theoretical and empirical fronts to describe the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) among mutations exposed to selection. Although we are still some way from describing the complete DFE among all mutations, theoretical work stemming from the mutational landscape models of Gillespie (1984) suggests that restricting attention to beneficial mutatio...